On 2018/1/9 0:31, Larry Finger wrote:
On 01/08/2018 10:21 AM, Kalle Valo wrote:
Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
b43_radio_2057_init_post is not called in an interrupt handler
nor holding a spinlock.
The function mdelay in it can be replaced with msleep, to reduce
busy wait.
Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai
Larry Finger writes:
> On 01/08/2018 10:21 AM, Kalle Valo wrote:
>> Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
>>
>>> b43_radio_2057_init_post is not called in an interrupt handler
>>> nor holding a spinlock.
>>> The function mdelay in it can be replaced with msleep, to reduce busy wait.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Ba
On 01/08/2018 10:21 AM, Kalle Valo wrote:
Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
b43_radio_2057_init_post is not called in an interrupt handler
nor holding a spinlock.
The function mdelay in it can be replaced with msleep, to reduce busy wait.
Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai
You submitted an identical patch a week e
Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
> b43_radio_2057_init_post is not called in an interrupt handler
> nor holding a spinlock.
> The function mdelay in it can be replaced with msleep, to reduce busy wait.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai
You submitted an identical patch a week earlier:
https://patchwork.kernel.o
On 12/30/2017 05:08 AM, Jia-Ju Bai wrote:
b43_radio_2057_init_post is not called in an interrupt handler
nor holding a spinlock.
The function mdelay in it can be replaced with msleep, to reduce busy wait.
Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai
checkpatch.pl reports the following warning for this patch:
W
b43_radio_2057_init_post is not called in an interrupt handler
nor holding a spinlock.
The function mdelay in it can be replaced with msleep, to reduce busy wait.
Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai
---
drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/phy_n.c |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
di
b43_radio_2057_init_post is not called in an interrupt handler
nor holding a spinlock.
The function mdelay in it can be replaced with msleep, to reduce busy wait.
Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai
---
drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/b43/phy_n.c |2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
di
