>> @@ -708,11 +708,11 @@ static void svc_addr(struct seq_file *seq, struct
>> sockaddr_atmsvc *addr)
>> static int e164[] = { 1, 8, 4, 6, 1, 0 };
>>
>> if (*addr->sas_addr.pub) {
>> - seq_printf(seq, "%s", addr->sas_addr.pub);
>> + seq_puts(seq, addr->sa
On Sat, Jan 6, 2018 at 11:44 PM, SF Markus Elfring
wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring
> Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2018 22:34:12 +0100
>
> Two strings should be quickly put into a sequence by two function calls.
> Thus use the function "seq_puts" instead of "seq_printf".
>
> This issue was detected by using the
>> Is the function "seq_puts" a bit more efficient for the desired output
>> of a single string in comparison to calling the function "seq_printf"
>> for this purpose?
>
> Will you please be so kind and tell us?
How do you think about to get the run time characteristics for these
sequence output
On Sun, 7 Jan 2018 09:19:17 +0100
SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> >> Two strings should be quickly put into a sequence by two function calls.
> >> Thus use the function "seq_puts" instead of "seq_printf".
> >>
> >> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
> >
> > Can you please exp
>> Two strings should be quickly put into a sequence by two function calls.
>> Thus use the function "seq_puts" instead of "seq_printf".
>>
>> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
>
> Can you please explain what the issue really is and what you're trying
> to do here?
Is the
On Sat, 6 Jan 2018 22:44:08 +0100
SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring
> Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2018 22:34:12 +0100
>
> Two strings should be quickly put into a sequence by two function calls.
> Thus use the function "seq_puts" instead of "seq_printf".
>
> This issue was detected by using
From: Markus Elfring
Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2018 22:34:12 +0100
Two strings should be quickly put into a sequence by two function calls.
Thus use the function "seq_puts" instead of "seq_printf".
This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring
---
net/atm/clip
