Hello list, Herbert!
> >
> > Aug 20 01:07:24 192.168.2.50 kernel: [42992885.04] []
> > __gnbd_send_req+0x196/0x28d [gnbd]
>
> Please talk to the GNBD people about this.
I know, you have right!
I get the same answer from linux-raid list.
But now I think I must ask you: Are you sure?
I use co
On Sat, Aug 20, 2005 at 12:02:01PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Aug 20 01:07:24 192.168.2.50 kernel: [42992885.04] []
> __gnbd_send_req+0x196/0x28d [gnbd]
Please talk to the GNBD people about this.
Thanks,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/
Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[E
D]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2005 11:43 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: [Bug 5050] New: KERNEL: assertion (cnt <= tp->packets_out)
failed at net/ipv4/tcp_input.c (1476)
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > I gets this probl
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I gets this problem sometimes too.
> Try this two patch in 2.6.13-rc6, and I have attached the log.
> (the log is filtered with | grep -v "last message repeated")
Sorry, the debugging patch in the original email is wrong. Please
try this one instead.
Thanks,
--
Vis
gt;; "Stephen Hemminger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "''David S. Miller'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Saturday, August 13, 2005 1:32 AM
Subject: Re: Fw: [Bug 5050] New: KERNEL: assertion (cnt <= tp->packets_out)
failed at net/ipv4/tcp_input.c (1476)
On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 10:41:20AM +0200, pstaszewski wrote:
>
> ok i applied this patch and debug show:
>
> packets_out = 16, fackets_out = 5, reordering = 3, sack_ok = 0x3,
> mss_cache=1460
Doh! I got the if statement wrong in the debugging patch so instead
of printing things out when the bug
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 09:15:44AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>
> Steps to reproduce:
> System is running 2 days and after that time produce this message
>
> KERNEL: assertion (cnt <= tp->packets_out) failed at
> net/ipv4/tcp_input.c (1476) KERNEL: assertion
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2005 06:14:57 -0700
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Bug 5050] New: KERNEL: assertion (cnt <= tp->packets_out)
failed at net/ipv4/tcp_input.c (1476)
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5050
Summary:
On Sun, Aug 07, 2005 at 03:25:55PM +0200, John B?ckstrand wrote:
>
> [148475.651000] [ cut here ]
> [148475.651050] kernel BUG at net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:918!
Yes, as Andrew said, this bug should be fixed in the latest git tree.
So please test with that plus the debugging pa
John Bäckstrand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Someone asked if I could try to trigger this assertion again, and I'm
> afraid I probably cannot, I didnt do anything special at the time. But
> I've got something even better for you all, got a BUG from something
> tcp-related. Mind you, I am t
Someone asked if I could try to trigger this assertion again, and I'm
afraid I probably cannot, I didnt do anything special at the time. But
I've got something even better for you all, got a BUG from something
tcp-related. Mind you, I am trying to find a possibly hardware-related
issue here, so
On Sat, Aug 06, 2005 at 02:06:53PM +0200, John B?ckstrand wrote:
>
> Yes, I have no other patches in, so if it was not in -RC5, I was not
> running it.
OK having looked at it briefly I have a hunch that it may be the
fackets_out issue (when the effective MSS is reduced tcp_tso_acked
may increase
From: Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2005 17:57:17 +1000
> Hang on a second, the original poster mentioned rc5. Is this really
> pristine rc5 with the one netpoll patch? If so then it can't be the
> patches we're talking about because they only went in days later.
This seems to
Hang on a second, the original poster mentioned rc5. Is this really
pristine rc5 with the one netpoll patch? If so then it can't be the
patches we're talking about because they only went in days later.
Yes, I have no other patches in, so if it was not in -RC5, I was not
running it.
---
John
On Sat, Aug 06, 2005 at 12:24:35PM +1000, herbert wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 05, 2005 at 09:32:08AM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> >
> > It therefore may be desirable to keep Herbert's fix in there, but
> > back out my changes until they can be reimplemented correctly.
> >
> > Herbert?
>
> Sure. Let
On Fri, Aug 05, 2005 at 09:32:08AM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
>
> It therefore may be desirable to keep Herbert's fix in there, but
> back out my changes until they can be reimplemented correctly.
>
> Herbert?
Sure. Let's back it out until a better solution is found.
--
Visit Openswan at ht
From: John Bäckstrand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2005 17:53:11 +0200
> KERNEL: assertion (cnt <= tp->packets_out) failed at
> net/ipv4/tcp_input.c (1476)
I suspect this is a side effect of some changes Herbert Xu and
myself did to fix some other bugs.
Herbert,
I get
KERNEL: assertion (cnt <= tp->packets_out) failed at
net/ipv4/tcp_input.c (1476)
with 2.6.13-rc5, also with a small netpoll patch that shouldnt affect
these things. (Topic: "lockups with netconsole on e1000 on media
insertion").
I have a decent amount of dropped
18 matches
Mail list logo
