Re: airo: inconsistent {hardirq-on-W} -> {in-hardirq-W} usage.

2006-08-14 Thread Pekka Pietikainen
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 02:38:51PM +0300, Pekka Pietikainen wrote: > Hmm... I retried with a 2.6.18rc4-based rawhide kernel and the warning > is still there, previous one was rc3-git7. > > Could be http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-netdev&m=115461336523555&w=2 > which isn't upstream yet, right

Re: airo: inconsistent {hardirq-on-W} -> {in-hardirq-W} usage.

2006-08-08 Thread John W. Linville
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 10:52:22PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 02:38:51PM +0300, Pekka Pietikainen wrote: > > Could be http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-netdev&m=115461336523555&w=2 > > which isn't upstream yet, right? > > That's a separate bug fix which should produce

Re: airo: inconsistent {hardirq-on-W} -> {in-hardirq-W} usage.

2006-08-08 Thread Herbert Xu
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 02:38:51PM +0300, Pekka Pietikainen wrote: > > Hmm... I retried with a 2.6.18rc4-based rawhide kernel and the warning > is still there, previous one was rc3-git7. Are you sure it's the same warning? The one you quoted earlier is caused by the lock validator mixing up spin l

Re: airo: inconsistent {hardirq-on-W} -> {in-hardirq-W} usage.

2006-08-08 Thread Dan Williams
On Tue, 2006-08-08 at 12:44 +0300, Pekka Pietikainen wrote: > Only aironet lockdep related report I could find was > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-netdev&m=115406279721287&w=2 Shouldn't this be fixed by the wireless events patch that was a result of the orinoco lockdep issues that davej p

Re: airo: inconsistent {hardirq-on-W} -> {in-hardirq-W} usage.

2006-08-08 Thread Pekka Pietikainen
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 09:16:13PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote: > Pekka Pietikainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Only aironet lockdep related report I could find was > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-netdev&m=115406279721287&w=2 > > > > this looks a bit different: > > > > Linux version 2.6

Re: airo: inconsistent {hardirq-on-W} -> {in-hardirq-W} usage.

2006-08-08 Thread Herbert Xu
Pekka Pietikainen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Only aironet lockdep related report I could find was > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-netdev&m=115406279721287&w=2 > > this looks a bit different: > > Linux version 2.6.17-1.2528.fc6 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 4.1.1 > 20060802 (Red Hat

airo: inconsistent {hardirq-on-W} -> {in-hardirq-W} usage.

2006-08-08 Thread Pekka Pietikainen
Only aironet lockdep related report I could find was http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-netdev&m=115406279721287&w=2 this looks a bit different: Linux version 2.6.17-1.2528.fc6 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 4.1.1 20060802 (Red Hat 4.1.1-14)) #1 SMP Sun Aug 6 01:43:42 EDT 2006 ===