On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 02:55:56PM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>
> Hm, I was wondering if there's a nicer way of getting the same result.
> Does it need to be done that way?
Actually you could use the skb->cb buffer which can store anything and
doesn't need to be cleaned up.
Cheers,
--
V
Herbert Xu wrote:
> I've had a look at now and you can just stuff it into one of the other
> pointers that's still there. We just need to make sure that it is
> reset properly before we feed the packet into the stack. The pointer
> skb->dev is one candidate but there are plenty of others.
>
H
Hi Jeremy:
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 11:36:17AM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
>
> I wonder if you've got a chance to look at netfront in light of the new
> stuff in davem's network tree (the stuff that's in
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/davem/net-2.6.22.git).
I've had a look at
Hi Herbert,
I wonder if you've got a chance to look at netfront in light of the new
stuff in davem's network tree (the stuff that's in
http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/davem/net-2.6.22.git).
In particular, struct sk_buff has been changed so that "nh" has gone,
and the replacement can be
