Re: Wireless tap device

2006-04-05 Thread Marcus Better
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mike Kershaw wrote: >>Looks very interesting, but I had in mind exactly the opposite (if I >>understand correctly): packets written to the virtual device would be >>received by the kernel, instead of going out to the radio. The kernel >>would think it

Re: Wireless tap device

2006-04-05 Thread Marcus Better
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mike Kershaw wrote: > Josh Wright and I have been working on a library to make a common > injection layer across the drivers, Looks very interesting, but I had in mind exactly the opposite (if I understand correctly): packets written to the virtual de

Re: Wireless tap device

2006-04-04 Thread Mike Kershaw
On Tue, Apr 04, 2006 at 03:43:03PM +0200, Marcus Better wrote: > Hi developers, > > is there a convenient way to inject 802.11 frames into the stack from > user-space? I am thinking about something analogous to the tap device for > Ethernet. That is, a "virtual" wireless device that would receive

Wireless tap device

2006-04-04 Thread Marcus Better
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi developers, is there a convenient way to inject 802.11 frames into the stack from user-space? I am thinking about something analogous to the tap device for Ethernet. That is, a "virtual" wireless device that would receive frames from user-space. I