RE: VxLAN support question

2015-08-12 Thread Andrew Qu
Starovoitov [mailto:a...@plumgrid.com] Sent: Monday, August 10, 2015 10:37 PM To: Andrew Qu; David Miller Cc: tg...@suug.ch; je...@nicira.com; pshe...@nicira.com; netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: VxLAN support question On 8/10/15 4:47 PM, Andrew Qu wrote: > > Pretty much what I want is that

RE: VxLAN support question

2015-08-11 Thread Andrew Qu
...@suug.ch; je...@nicira.com; pshe...@nicira.com; netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: VxLAN support question On 8/10/15 4:47 PM, Andrew Qu wrote: > > Pretty much what I want is that kernel will have about 1K interfaces > (something like Tunnel100.1-tunnel100.1000 To be created and attached

Re: VxLAN support question

2015-08-10 Thread Alexei Starovoitov
On 8/10/15 4:47 PM, Andrew Qu wrote: Pretty much what I want is that kernel will have about 1K interfaces (something like Tunnel100.1-tunnel100.1000 To be created and attached to 1K bridge domains on which each VNI is associated with given VNI to bridge-domain will be assigned using other CLI

VxLAN support question

2015-08-10 Thread Andrew Qu
Hi VxLAN experts, In user space, we are developing a CLI as the following: Interface tunnel 100 Mode vxlan Remote ip ipv4 19.1.1.1 Local ip ipv4 20.1.1.1 Vni 1-1000 < With Kernel 3.12.37, we can't support above configurations in kernel. (OR PLEASE Correct me if I am wrong)