Hello,
On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 3:00 AM Florian Westphal wrote:
>
> Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > > Sure! TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT delays the creation of the socket until data
> > > has been sent by the client *or* the specified time has expired upon
> > > which a last SYN/ACK is sent and if the client replies
> On Jun 7, 2020, at 04:01, Florian Westphal wrote:
>
> Eric Dumazet wrote:
>>> Sure! TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT delays the creation of the socket until data
>>> has been sent by the client *or* the specified time has expired upon
>>> which a last SYN/ACK is sent and if the client replies with an ACK
Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > Sure! TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT delays the creation of the socket until data
> > has been sent by the client *or* the specified time has expired upon
> > which a last SYN/ACK is sent and if the client replies with an ACK the
> > socket will be created and presented to the accept()-c
Hello,
On Thu, 4 Jun 2020, Christoph Paasch wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 11:05 PM Julian Anastasov wrote:
> >
> >
> > > The behavior that we want is for the receipt of the duplicate bare
> > > ACK to not result in waking up user space. The socket still hasn't
> > > received any da
On 6/5/20 7:57 AM, Christoph Paasch wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 6:28 PM Eric Dumazet wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 6/4/20 4:18 PM, Christoph Paasch wrote:
>>> +Eric & Leif
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>>
>>> (digging out an old thread ... ;-) )
>>>
>>
>> Is there a tldr; ?
>
> Sure! TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT delays
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 6:28 PM Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
>
>
> On 6/4/20 4:18 PM, Christoph Paasch wrote:
> > +Eric & Leif
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> >
> > (digging out an old thread ... ;-) )
> >
>
> Is there a tldr; ?
Sure! TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT delays the creation of the socket until data
has been sent by th
On 6/4/20 4:18 PM, Christoph Paasch wrote:
> +Eric & Leif
>
> Hello,
>
>
> (digging out an old thread ... ;-) )
>
Is there a tldr; ?
+Eric & Leif
Hello,
(digging out an old thread ... ;-) )
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 11:05 PM Julian Anastasov wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, 10 Jun 2014, Wayne Badger wrote:
>
> > On 6/7/14, 10:41 AM, Julian Anastasov wrote:
> > >
> > > This discussion (http://marc.info/?t=1255410629