Okay, then I misunderstood your earlier comment.
And guess it is not backported to latest 4.19 as that also fails.
Just to sanity check, I'll test mainline to satisfy my curiosity.
Thank you all for your time and replies!
On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 10:20 PM Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
>
>
> On 03/11/2019
On 03/11/2019 09:12 PM, Captain Wiggum wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> To summarize this thread, we test for IPv6 Ready Logo using Self-test
> Tools (TAHI Project) here:
> https://www.ipv6ready.org/?page=documents&tag=ipv6-core-protocols
>
> 4.9.133 and previous passed 100%. Beginning with 4.9.134 it fai
In case it is useful, this was the bisect test progress:
my-build-name test commit/release
- --
kernel-4.9.133-1 good [deb3303f665b31c29210ef4b30b1e69cb06cc397]
Linux 4.9.133
kernel-4.9.134-1 bad[1d326a94d1039e4543edd97cbaf0fc38d2cefbb5]
Linux 4.9.1
Hi All,
To summarize this thread, we test for IPv6 Ready Logo using Self-test
Tools (TAHI Project) here:
https://www.ipv6ready.org/?page=documents&tag=ipv6-core-protocols
4.9.133 and previous passed 100%. Beginning with 4.9.134 it fails 18
tests related to IPv6 fragment headers.
I have done a git
Thank you all for the reply.
The problem started with 4.9.133, and persists to latest 4.9 today.
I will work on the bisect approach to find the bad commit(s).
It will take a few days. I will reply back when I have more info.
On Wed, Mar 6, 2019 at 3:34 PM Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
>
>
> On 03/06/2019
From: Eric Dumazet
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2019 14:34:25 -0800
> That was Florian patch that was later reverted, right ?
>
> 0ed4229b08c13c84a3c301a08defdc9e7f4467e6 ipv6: defrag: drop non-last frags
> smaller than min mtu
>
> -> reverted in
>
> d4289fcc9b16b89619ee1c54f829e05e56de8b9a net: IP6 def
On 03/06/2019 02:28 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Captain Wiggum
> Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2019 15:26:43 -0700
>
>> We are using the TAHI Self-test tools from IPv6 Ready Logo Program:
>> https://www.ipv6ready.org/?page=documents&tag=ipv6-core-protocols
>>
>> The test passed up to 4.9.133, then fail
On 3/6/19 2:26 PM, Captain Wiggum wrote:
> We are using the TAHI Self-test tools from IPv6 Ready Logo Program:
> https://www.ipv6ready.org/?page=documents&tag=ipv6-core-protocols
>
> The test passed up to 4.9.133, then fails ever since.
>
> The are about 20 failing test cases regarding IPv6 fragm
From: Captain Wiggum
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2019 15:26:43 -0700
> We are using the TAHI Self-test tools from IPv6 Ready Logo Program:
> https://www.ipv6ready.org/?page=documents&tag=ipv6-core-protocols
>
> The test passed up to 4.9.133, then fails ever since.
>
> The are about 20 failing test cases r
We are using the TAHI Self-test tools from IPv6 Ready Logo Program:
https://www.ipv6ready.org/?page=documents&tag=ipv6-core-protocols
The test passed up to 4.9.133, then fails ever since.
The are about 20 failing test cases regarding IPv6 fragments,
where the kernel is issuing an ICMPv6 parameter
10 matches
Mail list logo
