From: "Ilpo_Järvinen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 15:17:00 +0300 (EEST)
> On Thu, 31 May 2007, David Miller wrote:
>
> > Is it possible to update fastpath_cnt_hint properly perhaps?
>
> I think that would be valid and even accurate as it can checks skb's
> seq against fastpath_skb_
On Thu, 31 May 2007, David Miller wrote:
> From: "Ilpo_Järvinen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 14:28:21 +0300 (EEST)
>
> > There are IMHO two problems in it. First of all, nothing ensures that the
> > skb TCP is fragmenting is actually below the forwardmost sack block (and
> > th
From: "Ilpo_Järvinen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 23 Apr 2007 14:28:21 +0300 (EEST)
> There are IMHO two problems in it. First of all, nothing ensures that the
> skb TCP is fragmenting is actually below the forwardmost sack block (and
> thus is included to the fackets_out)...
Good catch, I a
Hi,
While looking through the users of fackets_out, i found this from
tcp_fragment(...):
/* If this packet has been sent out already, we must
* adjust the various packet counters.
*/
if (!before(tp->snd_nxt, TCP_SKB_CB(buff)->end_seq)) {
int dif
