Re: Strange TCP SACK behaviour in Linux TCP

2006-07-19 Thread Oumer Teyeb
Could you please CC your answers to me? thanx! Oumer Teyeb wrote: Hi Stephen, Thanks for the quick response. I have done what you asked and you can find the files at www.kom.auc.dk/~oumer/sackstuff.tar.gz I have run the different cases 10 times each, NT_NSACK[1-10].dat---no timestamp, no SAC

Re: Strange TCP SACK behaviour in Linux TCP

2006-07-18 Thread Oumer Teyeb
Hi Stephen, Thanks for the quick response. I have done what you asked and you can find the files at www.kom.auc.dk/~oumer/sackstuff.tar.gz I have run the different cases 10 times each, NT_NSACK[1-10].dat---no timestamp, no SACK NT_SACK[1-10].datno timestamp, SACK T_NSACK[1-10].dat---timesta

Re: Strange TCP SACK behaviour in Linux TCP

2006-07-18 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Tue, 18 Jul 2006 18:20:47 +0200 Oumer Teyeb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello Guys, > > I have some questions regarding TCP SACK implementation in Linux . > As I am a subscriber, could you please cc the reply to me? thanks! > > > I am doing these experiments to find out the impact of reorde

Re: Strange TCP SACK behaviour in Linux TCP

2006-07-18 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Tue, 18 Jul 2006 18:20:47 +0200 Oumer Teyeb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello Guys, > > I have some questions regarding TCP SACK implementation in Linux . > As I am a subscriber, could you please cc the reply to me? thanks! > > > I am doing these experiments to find out the impact of reorde