Re: Silent corruption with r8169

2007-04-05 Thread Andi Kleen
> I'll try to get to testing this, but I'm wondering if people may have > misunderstood my original post. I don't get any corruption over > Ethernet; it's just corruption on the filesystem during certain load > patterns that involve the Realtek ethernet card. When disabling hardware checksums help

Re: Silent corruption with r8169

2007-04-04 Thread Francois Romieu
Aaron Lehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : [...] > I'll try to get to testing this, but I'm wondering if people may have > misunderstood my original post. I don't get any corruption over > Ethernet; it's just corruption on the filesystem during certain load > patterns that involve the Realtek ethernet car

Re: Silent corruption with r8169

2007-04-04 Thread Aaron Lehmann
On Wed, Apr 04, 2007 at 08:45:04PM +0200, Francois Romieu wrote: > > [adding netdev] > > [meta-comment: I wish people wouldn't use such unnecessarily broad subjects > > -- how is it the x86-64 port's or AMD's fault when you have broken > > hardware? > > Would anybody write "Silent corruption on

Re: Silent corruption with r8169

2007-04-04 Thread Francois Romieu
Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : > Aaron Lehmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > [adding netdev] > [meta-comment: I wish people wouldn't use such unnecessarily broad subjects > -- how is it the x86-64 port's or AMD's fault when you have broken hardware? > Would anybody write "Silent corruption o