Re: RealTek 8169 support question

2007-08-13 Thread Chuck Lever
Francois Romieu wrote: Chuck Lever <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : [...] Not yet. I wanted to check with "the Maintainer" to see if it was worth trying. :-) The last time I tried a kernel build on one of these It is worth trying. FYI: I tested a 2.6.23-rc2 kernel over the weekend, and the NICs wor

Re: RealTek 8169 support question

2007-08-11 Thread Francois Romieu
Chuck Lever <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : [...] > Not yet. I wanted to check with "the Maintainer" to see if it was worth > trying. :-) The last time I tried a kernel build on one of these It is worth trying. > little Via processors, it took forever. Will give it a shot. Why can you not compile on

Re: RealTek 8169 support question

2007-08-10 Thread Chuck Lever
Francois Romieu wrote: Chuck Lever <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : [...] I just bought a new Jetway mainboard with a pair of RTL 8169 NICs. Mini-ITX J7F4 ? Yes. I wanted a low-power DSL router that will support IPv6 and have a familiar GUI. Have your tried 2.6.23-git-latest or at least a post 2.6

Re: RealTek 8169 support question

2007-08-10 Thread Francois Romieu
Chuck Lever <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : [...] > I just bought a new Jetway mainboard with a pair of RTL 8169 NICs. Mini-ITX J7F4 ? > After installing Fedora 7, and upgrading to 2.6.22.1-41.fc7, I still > can't get either of the NICs to recognize a link beat from my switch. > > lspci -v output: > >

RealTek 8169 support question

2007-08-10 Thread Chuck Lever
Hello Francois- I just bought a new Jetway mainboard with a pair of RTL 8169 NICs. After installing Fedora 7, and upgrading to 2.6.22.1-41.fc7, I still can't get either of the NICs to recognize a link beat from my switch. lspci -v output: 00:09.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co