Hi Eric,
On Tue, 2021-01-19 at 11:02 +0100, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
> > This does fix the problems reported on iwlwifi, were you planning to
> > submit it as a proper patch?
>
> Sure, I will do, thanks !
Did you do that and I missed it? Or would you prefer we did?
Thanks,
Johannes
Hi Eric, all,
Sorry we've been so silent on this.
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/tx.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/tx.c
> @@ -773,6 +773,7 @@ iwl_mvm_tx_tso_segment(struct sk_buff *skb,
> unsigned int num_subframes,
>
> next = skb_gso_segment(skb, netdev
On 12/21/20 12:01 PM, Rainer Suhm wrote:
Am 21.12.20 um 20:14 schrieb Eric Dumazet:
On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 8:04 PM Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 7:46 PM Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Sat, Dec 19, 2020 at 5:55 PM Ben Greear wrote:
On 12/19/20 7:18 AM, Johannes Berg wrote:
On Fri
On Mon, 21 Dec 2020 19:46:23 +0100 Eric Dumazet wrote:
> So maybe the issue is coming from traffic coming from a VM through a
> tun device or something,
> and our handling of GSO_ROBUST / DODGY never cared about setting
> SKB_GSO_TCPV4 or SKB_GSO_TCPV6 if not already given by user space ?
>
> Or a
On 12/19/20 7:18 AM, Johannes Berg wrote:
On Fri, 2020-12-18 at 12:16 -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
On Thu, 17 Dec 2020 12:40:26 -0800 Ben Greear wrote:
On 12/17/20 10:20 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 7:13 PM Ben Greear wrote:
It is the iwlwifi/mvm logic that supports ax200.
On Fri, 2020-12-18 at 12:16 -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Dec 2020 12:40:26 -0800 Ben Greear wrote:
> > On 12/17/20 10:20 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > > On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 7:13 PM Ben Greear
> > > wrote:
> > > > It is the iwlwifi/mvm logic that supports ax200.
> > >
> > > Let
On Thu, 17 Dec 2020 12:40:26 -0800 Ben Greear wrote:
> On 12/17/20 10:20 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 7:13 PM Ben Greear wrote:
> >
> >> It is the iwlwifi/mvm logic that supports ax200.
> >
> > Let me ask again :
> >
> > I see two different potential call points :
> >
On 12/17/20 10:20 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 7:13 PM Ben Greear wrote:
It is the iwlwifi/mvm logic that supports ax200.
Let me ask again :
I see two different potential call points :
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/pcie/tx.c:1529:
tso_build_hdr(skb, hdr_page->po
On 12/17/2020 10:07 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 6:56 PM Ben Greear wrote:
On 12/17/20 2:11 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 12:59 AM Ben Greear wrote:
On 12/16/20 3:09 PM, Ben Greear wrote:
Hello Eric,
The patch below evidently causes TCP throughput to
On 12/17/20 2:11 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 12:59 AM Ben Greear wrote:
On 12/16/20 3:09 PM, Ben Greear wrote:
Hello Eric,
The patch below evidently causes TCP throughput to be about 50Mbps instead of
700Mbps
when using ax200 to upload tcp traffic.
When I disable TSO, p
On 12/16/20 3:09 PM, Ben Greear wrote:
Hello Eric,
The patch below evidently causes TCP throughput to be about 50Mbps instead of
700Mbps
when using ax200 to upload tcp traffic.
When I disable TSO, performance goes back up to around 700Mbps.
As a followup, when I revert the patch, upload spee
11 matches
Mail list logo
