On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 05:43:43PM +0100, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> (Keith, I haven't forgotten about AVX by the way).
Hey, how's that going by the way? :) Just checking in as I'm still
having to carrying this part out of tree.
On Fri, Feb 28, 2025, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 2/28/25 16:36, Keith Busch wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 07:29:45AM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > > On Fri, Feb 28, 2025, Keith Busch wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 06:32:47AM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > > > > > @@ -35,1
On 2/28/25 16:36, Keith Busch wrote:
On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 07:29:45AM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
On Fri, Feb 28, 2025, Keith Busch wrote:
On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 06:32:47AM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
@@ -35,10 +35,12 @@ static inline int call_once(struct once *once, int
(*cb)(
On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 07:29:45AM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2025, Keith Busch wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 06:32:47AM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > > > @@ -35,10 +35,12 @@ static inline int call_once(struct once *once, int
> > > > (*cb)(struct once *))
> >
On Fri, Feb 28, 2025, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 06:32:47AM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/call_once.h b/include/linux/call_once.h
> > > index ddcfd91493ea..b053f4701c94 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/call_once.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/call
On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 06:32:47AM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2025, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 28, 2025, Lei Yang wrote:
> > > Hi Keith
> > >
> > > V3 introduced a new bug, the following error messages from qemu output
> > > after applying this patch to boo
On Fri, Feb 28, 2025, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2025, Lei Yang wrote:
> > Hi Keith
> >
> > V3 introduced a new bug, the following error messages from qemu output
> > after applying this patch to boot up a guest.
>
> Doh, my bug. Not yet tested, but this should fix things. Ass
On Fri, Feb 28, 2025, Lei Yang wrote:
> Hi Keith
>
> V3 introduced a new bug, the following error messages from qemu output
> after applying this patch to boot up a guest.
Doh, my bug. Not yet tested, but this should fix things. Assuming it does,
I'll
post a v3 so I can add my SoB.
diff --git
Hi Keith
V3 introduced a new bug, the following error messages from qemu output
after applying this patch to boot up a guest.
Error messages:
error: kvm run failed Invalid argument
error: kvm run failed Invalid argument
EAX= EBX= ECX= EDX=000806f4
ESI= EDI=
On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 2:28 PM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Mahesh Bandewar (महेश बंडेवार) (mahe...@google.com):
>> On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 10:36 AM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
>> > Quoting Mahesh Bandewar (महेश बंडेवार) (mahe...@google.com):
>> >> On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 10:11 AM, Serge E. Hallyn
Quoting Mahesh Bandewar (महेश बंडेवार) (mahe...@google.com):
> On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 10:36 AM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> > Quoting Mahesh Bandewar (महेश बंडेवार) (mahe...@google.com):
> >> On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 10:11 AM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> >> > Quoting Mahesh Bandewar (महेश बंडेवार) (mahe.
On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 10:36 AM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Mahesh Bandewar (महेश बंडेवार) (mahe...@google.com):
>> On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 10:11 AM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
>> > Quoting Mahesh Bandewar (महेश बंडेवार) (mahe...@google.com):
>> >> On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 7:47 AM, Serge E. Hallyn
Quoting Mahesh Bandewar (महेश बंडेवार) (mahe...@google.com):
> On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 10:11 AM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> > Quoting Mahesh Bandewar (महेश बंडेवार) (mahe...@google.com):
> >> On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 7:47 AM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> >> > Quoting James Morris (james.l.mor...@oracle.co
On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 10:11 AM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Mahesh Bandewar (महेश बंडेवार) (mahe...@google.com):
>> On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 7:47 AM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
>> > Quoting James Morris (james.l.mor...@oracle.com):
>> >> On Mon, 8 Jan 2018, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
>> >> I meant in
Quoting Mahesh Bandewar (महेश बंडेवार) (mahe...@google.com):
> On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 7:47 AM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> > Quoting James Morris (james.l.mor...@oracle.com):
> >> On Mon, 8 Jan 2018, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> >> I meant in terms of "marking" a user ns as "controlled" type -- it's
> >>
On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 7:47 AM, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting James Morris (james.l.mor...@oracle.com):
>> On Mon, 8 Jan 2018, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
>>
>> > > Also, why do we need the concept of a controlled user-ns at all, if the
>> > > default whitelist maintains existing behavior?
>> >
>> >
Quoting James Morris (james.l.mor...@oracle.com):
> On Mon, 8 Jan 2018, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
>
> > > Also, why do we need the concept of a controlled user-ns at all, if the
> > > default whitelist maintains existing behavior?
> >
> > In past discussions two uses have been brought up:
> >
> >
On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 11:35:26AM +1100, James Morris wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Jan 2018, Mahesh Bandewar (महेश बंडेवार) wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 12:31 AM, James Morris
> > wrote:
> > > On Wed, 27 Dec 2017, Mahesh Bandewar (महेश बंडेवार) wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hello James,
> > >>
> > >> Seems
Hello Michael,
I really don't want to turn this into how-to-hack guide but I do see
few points in your argument to make the case clearer. Please see the
comments inline.
On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 12:50 AM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
wrote:
> Hello Mahesh,
>
> On 12/28/2017 01:45 AM, Mahesh Bandew
On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 12:31 AM, James Morris
wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Dec 2017, Mahesh Bandewar (महेश बंडेवार) wrote:
>
>> Hello James,
>>
>> Seems like I missed your name to be added into the review of this
>> patch series. Would you be willing be pull this into the security
>> tree? Serge Hallyn ha
Hello Mahesh,
On 12/28/2017 01:45 AM, Mahesh Bandewar (महेश बंडेवार) wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 12:23 PM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
> wrote:
>> Hello Mahesh,
>>
>> On 27 December 2017 at 18:09, Mahesh Bandewar (महेश बंडेवार)
>> wrote:
>>> Hello James,
>>>
>>> Seems like I missed your nam
On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 12:23 PM, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
wrote:
> Hello Mahesh,
>
> On 27 December 2017 at 18:09, Mahesh Bandewar (महेश बंडेवार)
> wrote:
>> Hello James,
>>
>> Seems like I missed your name to be added into the review of this
>> patch series. Would you be willing be pull this
Hello Mahesh,
On 27 December 2017 at 18:09, Mahesh Bandewar (महेश बंडेवार)
wrote:
> Hello James,
>
> Seems like I missed your name to be added into the review of this
> patch series. Would you be willing be pull this into the security
> tree? Serge Hallyn has already ACKed it.
We seem to have no
Hello James,
Seems like I missed your name to be added into the review of this
patch series. Would you be willing be pull this into the security
tree? Serge Hallyn has already ACKed it.
Thanks,
--mahesh..
On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 2:30 PM, Mahesh Bandewar wrote:
> From: Mahesh Bandewar
>
> TL;DR
24 matches
Mail list logo
