On Tue, 2016-12-27 at 22:17:35 +0100, David Dillow wrote:
>On Sun, 2016-12-25 at 01:30 +0100, Thomas Preisner wrote:
>> In some cases the return value of a failing function is not being used
>> and the function typhoon_init_one() returns another negative error
>> code instead.
>
>I'm not sure these
On Sun, 2016-12-25 at 01:30 +0100, Thomas Preisner wrote:
> In some cases the return value of a failing function is not being used
> and the function typhoon_init_one() returns another negative error
> code instead.
I'm not sure these changes are especially valuable, since we'll need to
look at th
Hello!
On 12/25/2016 3:30 AM, Thomas Preisner wrote:
In some cases the return value of a failing function is not being used
and the function typhoon_init_one() returns another negative error
code instead.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Preisner
Signed-off-by: Milan Stephan
---
drivers/net/ethernet/3
