Re: [PATCH V4 net-next 0/6] Peer to Peer One-Step time stamping

2019-05-31 Thread David Miller
From: Richard Cochran Date: Thu, 30 May 2019 22:51:32 -0700 > Anyhow, I rebased v5 of my series to latest net-next, and I'm getting > a lot of these: > > In file included from net/ipv6/af_inet6.c:45:0: > ./include/linux/netfilter_ipv6.h: In function ‘nf_ipv6_br_defrag’: > ./include/linux/netfilt

Re: [PATCH V4 net-next 0/6] Peer to Peer One-Step time stamping

2019-05-30 Thread Richard Cochran
On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 12:58:33PM -0700, David Miller wrote: > I had to revert, this doesn't build. Sorry I missed macvlan, and thanks for the 'uninitialized' warning. It was a real latent bug. I wonder why my linaro 7.4 gcc didn't flag that... Anyhow, I rebased v5 of my series to latest net-ne

Re: [PATCH V4 net-next 0/6] Peer to Peer One-Step time stamping

2019-05-30 Thread David Miller
From: David Miller Date: Thu, 30 May 2019 11:55:07 -0700 (PDT) > Series applied, thanks Richard. I had to revert, this doesn't build. drivers/ptp/ptp_ines.c: In function ‘ines_txtstamp’: drivers/ptp/ptp_ines.c:674:3: warning: ‘old_skb’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninit

Re: [PATCH V4 net-next 0/6] Peer to Peer One-Step time stamping

2019-05-30 Thread David Miller
From: Richard Cochran Date: Tue, 28 May 2019 22:58:01 -0700 > This series adds support for PTP (IEEE 1588) P2P one-step time > stamping along with a driver for a hardware device that supports this. > > If the hardware supports p2p one-step, it subtracts the ingress time > stamp value from the Pd