On 11/11/2015 01:34 PM, William Dauchy wrote:
On Nov11 20:33, Tantilov, Emil S wrote:
If the diff above is the patch you are referring to then you will break the
SFP+ detection in the case where the driver was loaded while there were no
SFP+ modules present in the cages.
understood, I was surpr
On Nov11 20:33, Tantilov, Emil S wrote:
> If the diff above is the patch you are referring to then you will break the
> SFP+ detection in the case where the driver was loaded while there were no
> SFP+ modules present in the cages.
understood, I was surprised of the modification of behavior.
--
>-Original Message-
>From: William Dauchy [mailto:will...@gandi.net]
>Sent: Wednesday, November 11, 2015 9:35 AM
>To: Kirsher, Jeffrey T; Tantilov, Emil S
>Cc: da...@davemloft.net; netdev@vger.kernel.org; Schmitt, Phillip J; intel-
>wired-...@lists.osuosl.org
>Subject: regression in ixgbe S
