EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; netdev@vger.kernel.org;
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: SACK performance improvements - technical report and
> updated 2.6.6 patches
>
> From: "Douglas Leith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 08:40:26 -
>
&
From: "Douglas Leith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2005 08:40:26 -
> Well some feedback to that effect might have been useful a while
> back Dave.
I gave him feedback on at least 5 seperate occaisions, both
publicly and in private correspondance.
Others have done so as well.
-
To un
From: "Injong Rhee" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 21:11:40 -0500
> I wonder the same. I wonder how this new patch by the HTCP folks
> improves what we provided for the 2.6.x (which is currently
> incorporated in the latest linux version). My recollection says that
> this HTCP patch pe
> Sent: Monday, December 19, 2005 4:23 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: SACK performance improvements - technical report and
> updated 2.6.6 patches
>
> From: Baruch Even <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Baruch Even <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2005 20:26:54 +
> Your comments on this work would be appreciated.
Ummm... how about the patches that fix this which are in the 2.6.x
kernel already?
Yes, it's not your stuff, but it was incredibly less invasive and
probably works nearl
