From: Pavel Fedin
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 10:04:39 +0300
> Or is it just a formal requirement to RESEND?
Yes, this always what I ask people to do.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at htt
Hello!
> >> If you think I should reconsider the patch, you should resubmit it.
> >
> > I understand this, of course. But, before doing this i'd like to
> > clarify your concern, why exactly you think that loopback test will
> > break.
>
> If I didn't reply it means I don't have anything constr
From: Pavel Fedin
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 10:05:24 +0300
> Hello!
>
>> If you think I should reconsider the patch, you should resubmit it.
>
> I understand this, of course. But, before doing this i'd like to
> clarify your concern, why exactly you think that loopback test will
> break.
If I d
Hello!
> If you think I should reconsider the patch, you should resubmit it.
I understand this, of course. But, before doing this i'd like to
clarify your concern, why exactly you think that loopback test will
break. Because the (simplified) algorithm is:
do {
result = loopback_test()
From: Pavel Fedin
Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 09:36:24 +0300
> Hello! So, what should we do with this?
If you think I should reconsider the patch, you should resubmit it.
The ball is always in your court.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message t