RE: [patch net-next 1/7] skbuff: Add the offload_mr_fwd_mark field

2017-09-29 Thread Yuval Mintz
> hello Jiri and Yotam, > > On Thu, 2017-09-28 at 19:34 +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote: > > From: Yotam Gigi > > > > diff --git a/include/linux/skbuff.h b/include/linux/skbuff.h > > index 19e64bf..ada8214 100644 > > --- a/include/linux/skbuff.h > > +++ b/include/linux/skbuff.h > > @@ -772,6 +772,7 @@ st

Re: [patch net-next 1/7] skbuff: Add the offload_mr_fwd_mark field

2017-09-29 Thread Davide Caratti
hello Jiri and Yotam, On Thu, 2017-09-28 at 19:34 +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote: > From: Yotam Gigi > > diff --git a/include/linux/skbuff.h b/include/linux/skbuff.h > index 19e64bf..ada8214 100644 > --- a/include/linux/skbuff.h > +++ b/include/linux/skbuff.h > @@ -772,6 +772,7 @@ struct sk_buff { >

Re: [patch net-next 1/7] skbuff: Add the offload_mr_fwd_mark field

2017-09-28 Thread Jiri Pirko
Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 07:49:03PM CEST, and...@lunn.ch wrote: >On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 07:34:09PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote: >> From: Yotam Gigi >> >> Similarly to the offload_fwd_mark field, the offload_mr_fwd_mark field is >> used to allow partial offloading of MFC multicast routes. > >> The reason

Re: [patch net-next 1/7] skbuff: Add the offload_mr_fwd_mark field

2017-09-28 Thread Andrew Lunn
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 07:34:09PM +0200, Jiri Pirko wrote: > From: Yotam Gigi > > Similarly to the offload_fwd_mark field, the offload_mr_fwd_mark field is > used to allow partial offloading of MFC multicast routes. > The reason why the already existing "offload_fwd_mark" bit cannot be used > i