c: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; openib-general@openib.org;
> > netdev@vger.kernel.org
> > Subject: Re: [openib-general] [PATCH v4 01/13] Linux RDMA Core Changes
> >
> > On Thu, 2007-01-04 at 13:34 -0800, Roland Dreier wrote:
> > > OK, I'm back from vacation to
gt; Subject: Re: [openib-general] [PATCH v4 01/13] Linux RDMA Core Changes
>
> On Thu, 2007-01-04 at 13:34 -0800, Roland Dreier wrote:
> > OK, I'm back from vacation today.
> >
> > Anyway I don't have a definitive statement on this right now. I
guess
> > I
On Thu, 2007-01-04 at 13:34 -0800, Roland Dreier wrote:
> OK, I'm back from vacation today.
>
> Anyway I don't have a definitive statement on this right now. I guess
> I agree that I don't like having an extra parameter to a function that
> should be pretty fast (although req notify isn't quite a
On Thu, 2007-01-04 at 13:34 -0800, Roland Dreier wrote:
> OK, I'm back from vacation today.
>
> Anyway I don't have a definitive statement on this right now. I guess
> I agree that I don't like having an extra parameter to a function that
> should be pretty fast (although req notify isn't quite a
OK, I'm back from vacation today.
Anyway I don't have a definitive statement on this right now. I guess
I agree that I don't like having an extra parameter to a function that
should be pretty fast (although req notify isn't quite as hot as
something like posting a send request or polling a cq), g
> >
> > So what does this tell you?
> > To me it looks like there's a measurable speed difference,
> > and so we should find a way (e.g. what I proposed) to enable chelsio
> > userspace
> > without adding overhead to other low level drivers or indeed chelsio kernel
> > level code.
> >
> > What
