> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Cochran
> Sent: Saturday, October 12, 2019 4:27 PM
> To: Keller, Jacob E
> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org; Intel Wired LAN
> ;
> Kirsher, Jeffrey T ; Brandon Streiff
>
> Subject: Re: [net-next v3 3/7] mv88e6xxx: reject unsup
On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 07:36:31PM +, Keller, Jacob E wrote:
> Right, so in practice, unless it supports both edges, it should reject
> setting both RISING and FALLING together.
Enforcing that now *could* break existing user space, but I wonder
whether any programs would actually be affected.
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Cochran
> Sent: Saturday, October 12, 2019 11:24 AM
> To: Keller, Jacob E
> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org; Intel Wired LAN
> ;
> Kirsher, Jeffrey T ; Brandon Streiff
>
> Subject: Re: [net-next v3 3/7] mv88e6xxx: reject unsup
On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 11:11:05AM -0700, Jacob Keller wrote:
> Fix the mv88e6xxx PTP support to explicitly reject any future flags that
> get added to the external timestamp request ioctl.
>
> In order to maintain currently functioning code, this patch accepts all
> three current flags. This is b
