> On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 2:16 PM Limonciello, Mario
> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Generally the use of module parameters and sysfs usage are frowned
> > > upon.
> >
> > I was trying to build on the existing module parameters that existed
> > already for e1000e. So I guess I would ask, why are those
On Mon, 30 Nov 2020 13:29:04 -0800 Tony Nguyen wrote:
> From: Mario Limonciello
>
> S0ix for GBE flows are needed for allowing the system to get into deepest
> power state, but these require coordination of components outside of
> control of Linux kernel. For systems that have confirmed to coord
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 2:16 PM Limonciello, Mario
wrote:
>
> >
> > Generally the use of module parameters and sysfs usage are frowned
> > upon.
>
> I was trying to build on the existing module parameters that existed
> already for e1000e. So I guess I would ask, why are those not done in
> ethto
>
> Generally the use of module parameters and sysfs usage are frowned
> upon.
I was trying to build on the existing module parameters that existed
already for e1000e. So I guess I would ask, why are those not done in
ethtool? Should those parameters go away and they migrate to ethtool
for the
On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 1:32 PM Tony Nguyen wrote:
>
> From: Mario Limonciello
>
> S0ix for GBE flows are needed for allowing the system to get into deepest
> power state, but these require coordination of components outside of
> control of Linux kernel. For systems that have confirmed to coordi
