From: Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 12:04:21 +0200
> David Miller wrote:
> > Meanwhile, Patrick please clear up the situation :-)
>
>
> Attached is both an incremental patch and a complete replacement,
> please take whichever you like better :)
I applied the increme
David Miller wrote:
> Meanwhile, Patrick please clear up the situation :-)
Attached is both an incremental patch and a complete replacement,
please take whichever you like better :)
[RTNETLINK]: Add nested compat attribute
Add a nested compat attribute type that can be used to convert
attribut
Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P wrote:
> It looks like the one Patrick resent was the older version that requires
> a typecast. This is the function prototype currently in the kernel:
Oops, sorry, I messed that up. Will fix immediately.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev"
From: "Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 16:23:02 -0700
> It looks like the one Patrick resent was the older version that requires
> a typecast. This is the function prototype currently in the kernel:
>
> +extern int rtattr_parse_nested_compat(struct rtattr *tb[]
> From: Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 23:08:09 +0200
>
> > David Miller wrote:
> > >
> > >> I've been using this patch and the IPROUTE2 patches Patrick has
> > >> proposed with no issues. Can someone else look at these patches
> > >> when they have time? I'd be i
> -Original Message-
> From: David Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, June 25, 2007 2:30 PM
> To: Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; netdev@vger.kernel.org;
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [RTNETLINK]: Add nested compat attribute
>
From: "Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 14:33:12 -0700
> I'm putting them into the latest 2.6.23 tree right now - I'll have them
> tested and sent upstream later today.
Please repull as I just put Patrick's RTNETLINK patch in
"for real this time" :-)
-
To unsubsc
From: Patrick McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 23:08:09 +0200
> David Miller wrote:
> >
> >> I've been using this patch and the IPROUTE2 patches Patrick has proposed
> >> with no issues. Can someone else look at these patches when they have
> >> time? I'd be interested in seein
From: "Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 14:01:31 -0700
> Awesome Dave!! Thank you very much. :)
Please get your next round of patches ready, Patrick and
I can review them and barring any serious issues we can
finally put this stuff in to net-2.6.23.
-
To unsubsc
David Miller wrote:
I've been using this patch and the IPROUTE2 patches Patrick has proposed
with no issues. Can someone else look at these patches when they have
time? I'd be interested in seeing them make it into 2.6.23.
I've just put Patrick's patch into the net-2.6.23 tree.
Yo
> From: "Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 10:14:37 -0700
>
> > > This patch adds a new attribute type that can be used to replace
> > > non-nested attributes that contain structures by nested ones in a
> > > compatible way.
> > >
> > > This can be used in cas
From: "Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 10:14:37 -0700
> > This patch adds a new attribute type that can be used to
> > replace non-nested attributes that contain structures by
> > nested ones in a compatible way.
> >
> > This can be used in cases like Peter's
> This patch adds a new attribute type that can be used to
> replace non-nested attributes that contain structures by
> nested ones in a compatible way.
>
> This can be used in cases like Peter's who is trying to
> extend sch_prio, which currently uses a fixed structure
> without any holes.
>
Patrick McHardy wrote:
> extern int rtattr_parse(struct rtattr *tb[], int maxattr, struct rtattr
> *rta, int len);
> +extern int rtattr_parse_nested_compat(struct rtattr *tb[], int maxattr,
> + struct rtattr *rta, void **data, int len);
>
This version is a bi
14 matches
Mail list logo
