> > > > > Currently ethtool implementation does not have a way to pass the
> > > > > metadata for eeprom related operations. Some adapters have a
> > > > > complicated non-volatile memory implementation that requires
> > > > > additional information – there are drivers [bnx2x and bnxt] that
> > > >
On Sun, 2016-06-05 at 13:29 +, Yuval Mintz wrote:
> >
> > > > Currently ethtool implementation does not have a way to pass the
> > > > metadata for eeprom related operations. Some adapters have a
> > > > complicated non-volatile memory implementation that requires
> > > > additional informatio
> > > Currently ethtool implementation does not have a way to pass the
> > > metadata for eeprom related operations. Some adapters have a
> > > complicated non-volatile memory implementation that requires
> > > additional information – there are drivers [bnx2x and bnxt] that use
> > > the ‘magic’ f
On Sun, 2016-06-05 at 10:16 +, Yuval Mintz wrote:
> >
> > Currently ethtool implementation does not have a way to pass the metadata
> > for
> > eeprom related operations. Some adapters have a complicated non-volatile
> > memory implementation that requires additional information – there are
> Currently ethtool implementation does not have a way to pass the metadata for
> eeprom related operations. Some adapters have a complicated non-volatile
> memory implementation that requires additional information – there are drivers
> [bnx2x and bnxt] that use the ‘magic’ field in the {G,S}EEPRO
