RE: [RFC 1/3] secid reconciliation on inbound

2006-08-02 Thread Venkat Yekkirala
> On Tue, 1 Aug 2006, James Morris wrote: > > > On Tue, 1 Aug 2006, Venkat Yekkirala wrote: > > > > > +#define PACKET__COME_THRU 0x0008UL > > > +#define PACKET__GO_THRU 0x0010UL > > > > These names seem awkward, and do we really need a se

Re: [RFC 1/3] secid reconciliation on inbound

2006-08-01 Thread James Morris
On Tue, 1 Aug 2006, James Morris wrote: > On Tue, 1 Aug 2006, Venkat Yekkirala wrote: > > > +#define PACKET__COME_THRU 0x0008UL > > +#define PACKET__GO_THRU 0x0010UL > > These names seem awkward, and do we really need a separate perm for

Re: [RFC 1/3] secid reconciliation on inbound

2006-08-01 Thread James Morris
On Tue, 1 Aug 2006, Venkat Yekkirala wrote: > +#define PACKET__COME_THRU 0x0008UL > +#define PACKET__GO_THRU 0x0010UL These names seem awkward, and do we really need a separate perm for each direction? - James -- James Morris <[EMAIL