Re: Fw: [External] Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] Improve s0ix flows for systems i219LM

2020-12-15 Thread Neftin, Sasha
On 12/15/2020 19:20, Limonciello, Mario wrote: Absolutely - I'll ask them to look into this again. we need to explain why on Windows systems required 1s and on Linux systems up to 2.5s - otherwise it is not reliable approach - you will encounter others buggy system. (ME not POR on the Linux s

RE: Fw: [External] Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] Improve s0ix flows for systems i219LM

2020-12-15 Thread Limonciello, Mario
> > Absolutely - I'll ask them to look into this again. > > > we need to explain why on Windows systems required 1s and on Linux > systems up to 2.5s - otherwise it is not reliable approach - you will > encounter others buggy system. > (ME not POR on the Linux systems - is only one possible answer

Re: Fw: [External] Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] Improve s0ix flows for systems i219LM

2020-12-15 Thread Neftin, Sasha
] Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] Improve s0ix flows for systems i219LM Hi All, ### I've added Mark Pearson from Lenovo to the Cc so that Lenovo can investigate this issue further. Mark, this thread is about an issue with enabling S0ix support for e1000e (i219lm) controllers. This was enabled i

Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] Improve s0ix flows for systems i219LM

2020-12-15 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 12/14/20 8:36 PM, Limonciello, Mario wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> Sasha (and the other intel-wired-lan folks), thank you for investigating this >> further and for coming up with a better solution. >> >> Mario, thank you for implementing the new scheme. >> > > Sure. > >> I've tested this patch

RE: [PATCH v4 0/4] Improve s0ix flows for systems i219LM

2020-12-14 Thread Limonciello, Mario
> Hi All, > > Sasha (and the other intel-wired-lan folks), thank you for investigating this > further and for coming up with a better solution. > > Mario, thank you for implementing the new scheme. > Sure. > I've tested this patch set on a Lenovo X1C8 with vPRO and AMT enabled in the > BIOS >

Re: Fw: [External] Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] Improve s0ix flows for systems i219LM

2020-12-14 Thread Mark Pearson
ny.w...@canonical.com > > *Subject:* [External] Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] Improve s0ix flows for systems > i219LM >   > Hi All, > > > ### > > I've added Mark Pearson from Lenovo to the Cc so that Lenovo > can investigate this issue further. > > Mark, this

Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] Improve s0ix flows for systems i219LM

2020-12-14 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi All, Sasha (and the other intel-wired-lan folks), thank you for investigating this further and for coming up with a better solution. Mario, thank you for implementing the new scheme. I've tested this patch set on a Lenovo X1C8 with vPRO and AMT enabled in the BIOS (the previous issues were s

Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] Improve s0ix flows for systems i219LM

2020-12-14 Thread Alexander Duyck
On Mon, Dec 14, 2020 at 7:35 AM Mario Limonciello wrote: > > commit e086ba2fccda ("e1000e: disable s0ix entry and exit flows for ME > systems") > disabled s0ix flows for systems that have various incarnations of the > i219-LM ethernet controller. This was done because of some regressions > cause