> > Hi Andrew,
> >
> > We're waiting for the DPIO driver (which we depend on) to be moved
> > out of staging first, it's currently under review:
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/3/27/1086
>
> That's stalled on my side right now as the merge window is open and I
> can't do any new stuff until after
n ;
> > Ioana Ciornei ; gregkh
> > ; Linux Kernel Mailing List > ker...@vger.kernel.org>; Ruxandra Ioana Ciocoi Radulescu
> > ; Razvan Stefanescu
> > ; Roy Pledge ;
> > Networking
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] bus: fsl-mc: add restool userspace support
coi Radulescu
> ; Razvan Stefanescu
> ; Roy Pledge ;
> Networking
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] bus: fsl-mc: add restool userspace support
>
> On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 02:43:29PM +, Laurentiu Tudor wrote:
> > Hi Andrew,
> >
> > On 04/05/2018 03:48 PM, Andrew L
On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 02:43:29PM +, Laurentiu Tudor wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> On 04/05/2018 03:48 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> >>> Hi Laurentiu
> >>>
> >>> So i can use switchdev without it? I can modprobe the switchdev
> >>> driver, all the physical interfaces will appear, and i can use ip addr
>
Hi Andrew,
On 04/05/2018 03:48 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>>> Hi Laurentiu
>>>
>>> So i can use switchdev without it? I can modprobe the switchdev
>>> driver, all the physical interfaces will appear, and i can use ip addr
>>> add etc. I do not need to use a user space tool at all in order to use
>>> t
On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 02:09:47PM +, Laurentiu Tudor wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> On 04/05/2018 03:30 PM, gregkh wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 10:30:01AM +, Laurentiu Tudor wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> My 2c below.
> >>
> >> On 04/04/2018 03:42 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> I hear you. It
Hi Greg,
On 04/05/2018 03:30 PM, gregkh wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 10:30:01AM +, Laurentiu Tudor wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> My 2c below.
>>
>> On 04/04/2018 03:42 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
I hear you. It is more complicated this way...having all these individual
objects vs just a sin
> > Hi Laurentiu
> >
> > So i can use switchdev without it? I can modprobe the switchdev
> > driver, all the physical interfaces will appear, and i can use ip addr
> > add etc. I do not need to use a user space tool at all in order to use
> > the network functionality?
>
> Absolutely!
Great.
The
On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 10:30:01AM +, Laurentiu Tudor wrote:
> Hello,
>
> My 2c below.
>
> On 04/04/2018 03:42 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> >> I hear you. It is more complicated this way...having all these individual
> >> objects vs just a single "bundle" of them that represents a NIC. But,
>
On 04/05/2018 02:47 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 10:30:01AM +, Laurentiu Tudor wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> My 2c below.
>>
>> On 04/04/2018 03:42 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
I hear you. It is more complicated this way...having all these individual
objects vs just a single
On Thu, Apr 05, 2018 at 10:30:01AM +, Laurentiu Tudor wrote:
> Hello,
>
> My 2c below.
>
> On 04/04/2018 03:42 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> >> I hear you. It is more complicated this way...having all these individual
> >> objects vs just a single "bundle" of them that represents a NIC. But,
>
Hello,
My 2c below.
On 04/04/2018 03:42 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>> I hear you. It is more complicated this way...having all these individual
>> objects vs just a single "bundle" of them that represents a NIC. But, that's
>> the way the DPAA2 hardware is, and we're implementing kernel support for
On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 7:42 AM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>> I hear you. It is more complicated this way...having all these individual
>> objects vs just a single "bundle" of them that represents a NIC. But, that's
>> the way the DPAA2 hardware is, and we're implementing kernel support for
>> the hardw
> I hear you. It is more complicated this way...having all these individual
> objects vs just a single "bundle" of them that represents a NIC. But, that's
> the way the DPAA2 hardware is, and we're implementing kernel support for
> the hardware as it is.
Hi Stuart
I see we are not making any pr
On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 8:05 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
>> Suppose you want to create and assign a network interface to a KVM
>> virtual machine, you would do something like the following using
>> a user space tool like restool:
>>-create a new (empty) dprc object
>>-create a new dpni and assig
> Suppose you want to create and assign a network interface to a KVM
> virtual machine, you would do something like the following using
> a user space tool like restool:
>-create a new (empty) dprc object
>-create a new dpni and assign it to the dprc
>-create a new dpio and assign it to
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 10:43 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 4:27 PM, Ioana Ciornei wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>>
>>> Hi Ioana,
>>>
>>> So this driver is a direct passthrough to your hardware for passing fixed-
>>> length command/response pairs. Have you considered using a higher-level
On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 11:12:52AM +, Razvan Stefanescu wrote:
> DPAA2 offers several object-based abstractions for modeling network
> related devices (interfaces, L2 Ethernet switch) or accelerators
> (DPSECI - crypto and DPDCEI - compression), the latter not up-streamed yet.
> They are modele
Ruxandra
> Ioana Ciocoi Radulescu ; Razvan Stefanescu
> ; Roy Pledge ;
> Networking
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] bus: fsl-mc: add restool userspace support
>
> Hi Ioana
>
> > The commands listed above are for creating/destroying DPAA2 objects
> > in Management Com
Hi Ioana
> The commands listed above are for creating/destroying DPAA2 objects
> in Management Complex and not for runtime configuration where
> standard userspace tools are used.
Please can you explain why this is not just plumbing inside a
switchdev driver?
The hardware has a number of physica
>
> > I'm still not convinced either way (high-level or low-level
> > interface), but I think this needs to be discussed with the networking
> > maintainers. Given the examples on the github page you linked to, the
> > high-level user space commands based on these ioctls
> >
> >ls-addni # a
> I'm still not convinced either way (high-level or low-level
> interface), but I think
> this needs to be discussed with the networking maintainers. Given the examples
> on the github page you linked to, the high-level user space commands
> based on these ioctls
>
>ls-addni # adds a network
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 4:27 PM, Ioana Ciornei wrote:
> Hi,
>
>>
>> Hi Ioana,
>>
>> So this driver is a direct passthrough to your hardware for passing fixed-
>> length command/response pairs. Have you considered using a higher-level
>> interface instead?
>>
>> Can you list some of the commands th
23 matches
Mail list logo
