Hi,
> > (no changes since v1)
>
> I think you need to work on the method you're using to generate your
> patches. There are most definitely changes since v1. You described
> them in your cover letter (which you don't really need for a singleton
> patch) instead of here.
I agree, this was not int
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 3:33 AM Rakesh Pillai wrote:
>
> > What I'm trying to say is this. Imagine that:
> >
> > a) the device tree has the "variant" property.
> >
> > b) the BRD file has two entries, one for "board-id" (1) and one for
> > "board-id + chip-id" (2). It doesn't have one for "b
t: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] ath10k: add option for chip-id based BDF
> selection
>
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 7:44 PM Rakesh Pillai
> wrote:
> >
> > > > I missed on reviewing this change. Also I agree with Doug that this is
> > > > not
>
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 7:44 PM Rakesh Pillai wrote:
>
> > > I missed on reviewing this change. Also I agree with Doug that this is not
> > the change I was looking for.
> > >
> > > The argument "with_variant" can be renamed to "with_extra_params".
> > There is no need for any new argument to
6:27 AM
> > > To: Abhishek Kumar
> > > Cc: Kalle Valo ; Rakesh Pillai
> > > ; LKML ; ath10k
> > > ; Brian Norris ;
> > > linux-wireless ; David S. Miller
> > > ; Jakub Kicinski ; netdev
> > >
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH
Norris ;
> > linux-wireless ; David S. Miller
> > ; Jakub Kicinski ; netdev
> >
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] ath10k: add option for chip-id based BDF
> > selection
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 12:09 PM Abhishek Kumar
> &
t: Re: [PATCH v2 1/1] ath10k: add option for chip-id based BDF
> selection
>
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 12:09 PM Abhishek Kumar
> wrote:
> >
> > In some devices difference in chip-id should be enough to pick
> > the right BDF. Add another support for chi
Hi,
On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 12:09 PM Abhishek Kumar wrote:
>
> In some devices difference in chip-id should be enough to pick
> the right BDF. Add another support for chip-id based BDF selection.
> With this new option, ath10k supports 2 fallback options.
>
> The board name with chip-id as option
