On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 03:08:27PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > + rcu_read_lock();
> > + act = bpf_prog_run_xdp(xdp_prog, &xdp);
> > + rcu_read_unlock();
> > +
> > + if (orig_data != xdp.data) {
> > + offset = xdp.data - xdp.data_hard_start;
> > + len = xdp.data_end
On Thu, 2 Feb 2017 11:55:39 -0500, Michael Chan wrote:
> +/* returns the following:
> + * true- packet consumed by XDP and new buffer is allocated.
> + * false - packet should be passed to the stack.
> + */
> +bool bnxt_rx_xdp(struct bnxt *bp, struct bnxt_rx_ring_info *rxr, u16 cons,
> +
On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 9:18 AM, Mintz, Yuval wrote:
>> +config BNXT_XDP
>> + bool "Xpress Data Path (XDP) driver support"
>> + default n
>> + depends on BNXT && BPF
>> + ---help---
>> + Say Y here if you want to enable XDP in the driver to support
>> + eBPF programs in
> +config BNXT_XDP
> + bool "Xpress Data Path (XDP) driver support"
> + default n
> + depends on BNXT && BPF
> + ---help---
> + Say Y here if you want to enable XDP in the driver to support
> + eBPF programs in the fast path.
> +
Wasn't it recently discussed that per-fe
