Hello:
This patch was applied to netdev/net-next.git (refs/heads/master):
On Tue, 8 Dec 2020 19:33:46 -0800 you wrote:
> According to the X.25 documentation, there was a plan to implement
> X.25-over-802.2-LLC. It never finished but left various code stubs in the
> X.25 code. At this time it is
From: Xie He
> Sent: 10 December 2020 10:17
>
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 1:14 AM David Laight wrote:
> >
> > > To me, LLC1 and LLC2 are to Ethernet what UDP and TCP are to IP
> > > networks. I think we can use LLC1 and LLC2 wherever UDP and TCP can be
> > > used, as long as we are in the same LAN
On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 1:14 AM David Laight wrote:
>
> > To me, LLC1 and LLC2 are to Ethernet what UDP and TCP are to IP
> > networks. I think we can use LLC1 and LLC2 wherever UDP and TCP can be
> > used, as long as we are in the same LAN and are willing to use MAC
> > addresses as the addresses
From: Xie He
> Sent: 09 December 2020 22:54
>
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 1:21 PM David Laight wrote:
> >
> > I always wondered about running Class 2 transport directly over LLC2
> > (rather than Class 4 over LLC1).
> > But the only LLC2 user was netbios - and microsoft's LLC2 was broken.
> > Not to
On Wed, Dec 9, 2020 at 1:21 PM David Laight wrote:
>
> I always wondered about running Class 2 transport directly over LLC2
> (rather than Class 4 over LLC1).
> But the only LLC2 user was netbios - and microsoft's LLC2 was broken.
> Not to mention the window probing needed to handle systems that
>
From: Xie He
> Sent: 09 December 2020 03:34
>
> According to the X.25 documentation, there was a plan to implement
> X.25-over-802.2-LLC. It never finished but left various code stubs in the
> X.25 code. At this time it is unlikely that it would ever finish so it
> may be better to remove those co
