On Fri, 2016-03-11 at 11:33 +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-03-11 at 19:08 +0800, Joseph Chang wrote:
> >
> > I tested by
> > ./ethtool -E eth0 magic 0x9620 offset 0 length 3 value 0xf1 value 0xf2
> > value 0xf3
> >
> > I think ethtool need [ value N ] for each byte (so need three "v
On Fri, 2016-03-11 at 19:08 +0800, Joseph Chang wrote:
> I tested by
> ./ethtool -E eth0 magic 0x9620 offset 0 length 3 value 0xf1 value 0xf2 value
> 0xf3
>
> I think ethtool need [ value N ] for each byte (so need three "value xx" in
> above command line),
> am I right?
>
> Oh, I can see it
ubject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] dm9601: add support ethtool style utility
On Thu, 2016-03-10 at 20:51 +0800, Joseph Chang wrote:
> I did verify to dump EEPROM data and also write EEPROM by per byte.
>
> 1.Plug dm9601/dm9621 adapter and has get dm9601.ko be 'insmod' to have 'eht0',
On Thu, 2016-03-10 at 20:51 +0800, Joseph Chang wrote:
> I did verify to dump EEPROM data and also write EEPROM by per byte.
>
> 1.Plug dm9601/dm9621 adapter and has get dm9601.ko be 'insmod' to have 'eht0',
> 2.Run ethtool v3.7 (as attached executable file and it's help display.)
> 3. Commands:
>
The subject line on this is very vague; it should say which ethtool
operation you're implementing.
On Thu, 2016-03-10 at 19:24 +0800, Joseph CHANG wrote:
> Add function dm9601_set_eeprom which tested good with ethtool
> utility, include the eeprom words dump and the eeprom byte write.
>
> Signed
