On 15.04, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> > Out of curiosity, what is actually the performance impact on all
> > of this? We were just arguing on a different matter on two more
> > instructions in the fast-path, here it's refactoring the whole
> > function into several ones, I presume gcc won't inl
On Fri, 10 Apr 2015 15:47:34 +0200
Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> On 04/10/2015 02:15 PM, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> > This patch splits __netif_receive_skb_core() in smaller functions to improve
> > maintainability.
> >
> > The function __netif_receive_skb_core() has been split in two:
> >
> > * __net
On 04/15/2015 05:44 AM, David Laight wrote:
From: Alexander Duyck
Sent: 10 April 2015 20:56
On 04/10/2015 05:15 AM, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
+another_round:
+ ret = __netif_receive_skb_ingress(skb, pfmemalloc, orig_dev);
+ switch (ret) {
+ case NET_RX_SUCCESS:
+ case N
From: Alexander Duyck
> Sent: 10 April 2015 20:56
> On 04/10/2015 05:15 AM, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> > +another_round:
> > + ret = __netif_receive_skb_ingress(skb, pfmemalloc, orig_dev);
> > + switch (ret) {
> > + case NET_RX_SUCCESS:
> > + case NET_RX_DROP:
> > + break;
> > +
