On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 11:46:06AM -0500, David Miller wrote:
> From: Shyam Saini
> Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 14:54:35 +0530
>
> > On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 11:38:30PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
> >>
> >> Please do not ever submit two patches which have the same exact commit
> >> header line, as thes
From: "Mintz, Yuval"
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 17:05:05 +
> Other than the fact these 2 patches change 2 different qed files,
That's what I was trying to hint at, the locations within the drivers
were the unique element.
> is there any significant difference between what each does?
> If not, w
> > On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 11:38:30PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
> >>
> >> Please do not ever submit two patches which have the same exact
> >> commit header line, as these two patches do.
> >>
> >> When someone looks into the shortlog of GIT history all they will see
> >> is "qed: Replace memset
From: Shyam Saini
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 14:54:35 +0530
> On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 11:38:30PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
>>
>> Please do not ever submit two patches which have the same exact commit
>> header line, as these two patches do.
>>
>> When someone looks into the shortlog of GIT history
On Sun, Jan 15, 2017 at 11:38:30PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
>
> Please do not ever submit two patches which have the same exact commit
> header line, as these two patches do.
>
> When someone looks into the shortlog of GIT history all they will see
> is "qed: Replace memset with eth_zero_addr"
Please do not ever submit two patches which have the same exact commit
header line, as these two patches do.
When someone looks into the shortlog of GIT history all they will see
is "qed: Replace memset with eth_zero_addr" twice.
This gives the reader no idea what might be different between thos
