Re: Question on TSO maximum segment sizes.

2007-10-11 Thread Ben Greear
John Heffner wrote: Ben Greear wrote: I just tried turning off my explicit SO_SNDBUF/SO_RCVBUG settings in my app, and the connection ran very poorly through a link with even a small bit of latency (~2-4ms I believe). I often run at full gigabit or faster with latencies of 100+ ms. Can you

Re: Question on TSO maximum segment sizes.

2007-10-11 Thread John Heffner
Ben Greear wrote: I just tried turning off my explicit SO_SNDBUF/SO_RCVBUG settings in my app, and the connection ran very poorly through a link with even a small bit of latency (~2-4ms I believe). I often run at full gigabit or faster with latencies of 100+ ms. Can you give a bit more detai

Re: Question on TSO maximum segment sizes.

2007-10-11 Thread David Miller
From: Ben Greear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 17:17:48 -0700 > Was the auto-tuning put in after 2.6.20? If not, has this > been tested through a higher latency link? Or, am I confused > and you are talking about some other setsockopt? It's been there for quite some time. - To unsu

Re: Question on TSO maximum segment sizes.

2007-10-11 Thread Ben Greear
Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P wrote: From: Rick Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 16:50:46 -0700 For just messing about, might it be possible to tweak the socket buffer sizes and tcp_tso_win_divisor to kludge things for a short while? Couldn't ship that way certainly, but assuming Pe

RE: Question on TSO maximum segment sizes.

2007-10-11 Thread Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
> From: Rick Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 16:50:46 -0700 > > > For just messing about, might it be possible to tweak the socket > > buffer sizes and tcp_tso_win_divisor to kludge things for a short > > while? Couldn't ship that way certainly, but assuming > Peter's going

Re: Question on TSO maximum segment sizes.

2007-10-11 Thread David Miller
From: Rick Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 16:50:46 -0700 > For just messing about, might it be possible to tweak the socket buffer sizes > and tcp_tso_win_divisor to kludge things for a short while? Couldn't ship > that > way certainly, but assuming Peter's going to get his b

Re: Question on TSO maximum segment sizes.

2007-10-11 Thread Rick Jones
David Miller wrote: From: "Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 16:27:14 -0700 I'm having an issue with TSO right vs. hardware that can't take the maximum segment size sent from the stack. I've been told that the maximum packet size that can be sent to the hardwa

Re: Question on TSO maximum segment sizes.

2007-10-11 Thread David Miller
From: "Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 16:27:14 -0700 > I'm having an issue with TSO right vs. hardware that can't take the > maximum segment size sent from the stack. I've been told that the > maximum packet size that can be sent to the hardware today is 64k, b

Question on TSO maximum segment sizes.

2007-10-11 Thread Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P
I'm having an issue with TSO right vs. hardware that can't take the maximum segment size sent from the stack. I've been told that the maximum packet size that can be sent to the hardware today is 64k, but my hardware can only take 32k in certain modes per queue due to hardware limitations. I have