Vlad Yasevich wrote:
On Wed, 2006-04-05 at 10:38 -0600, Mark Butler wrote:
The problem in this case is skb1 does not own the skb_shared_info
structure (and hence the frag_list) once it has been cloned.
skb_unshare is the function that should be used to get a modifiable copy.
So, wha
On Wed, 2006-04-05 at 10:38 -0600, Mark Butler wrote:
> Vlad Yasevich wrote:
>
> >Hi All
> >
> >I am trying to understand if it is a good idea to have cloned skbs
> >reside on a frag_list?
> >
> >I've ran into a situation with SCTP, where it is possible to create
> >infinite recursion loops by hav
On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 11:39:05AM -0400, Vlad Yasevich wrote:
> Hi All
>
> I am trying to understand if it is a good idea to have cloned skbs
> reside on a frag_list?
>
> I've ran into a situation with SCTP, where it is possible to create
> infinite recursion loops by having cloned skbs reside o
Vlad Yasevich wrote:
Hi All
I am trying to understand if it is a good idea to have cloned skbs
reside on a frag_list?
I've ran into a situation with SCTP, where it is possible to create
infinite recursion loops by having cloned skbs reside on a frag_list.
We end up in a situation where have tw
Hi All
I am trying to understand if it is a good idea to have cloned skbs
reside on a frag_list?
I've ran into a situation with SCTP, where it is possible to create
infinite recursion loops by having cloned skbs reside on a frag_list.
We end up in a situation where have two clones skb1 and skb2 t
