Thomas,
Yes, I see your point that it is efficient to do specific matching
rather than a generic one. The idea what you have proposed through the
steps is very clear. Would try your work on our campus once you are
ready.
Continuing the discussion further, may be performance impact for the
text ba
* Anand SVR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2005-08-08 15:07
> I am happy to know that there is a way of achieving http level packet
> classification once the connection tracking is also in place. We can
> even think of other string combinations for url based classification,
> not just what I mentioned in my
Thomas,
Thanks for the detailed response. Thought my mail was long forgotten :)
I am happy to know that there is a way of achieving http level packet
classification once the connection tracking is also in place. We can
even think of other string combinations for url based classification,
not ju
* Anand SVR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2005-07-27 23:17
> As a starting point, I would like to define classification rules such
> that web access to
> *.edu OR *.net OR *.org can be put under one bandwidth chunk. Public
> mail sites such as *.yahoo.com OR gmail.com OR *hotmail.com under a
> different ch
Hi,
I am one of the network admins of a campus of large community who
tries to make sure that the academic community is kept happy in spite
of a congested access link. My professor keeps asking me why can't you
give higher bandwidth for web access to educational, and any academic
related sites. I
