On Saturday 22 September 2007, Ulrich Kunitz wrote:
> Michael Buesch wrote:
>
> > On Saturday 22 September 2007 11:48:00 Ulrich Kunitz wrote:
> > > A real high-quality driver will require Johannes' proposed
> > > mac80211 driver interface changes to be merged and TX
> > > confirmations handled in
Michael Buesch wrote:
> On Saturday 22 September 2007 11:48:00 Ulrich Kunitz wrote:
> > A real high-quality driver will require Johannes' proposed
> > mac80211 driver interface changes to be merged and TX
> > confirmations handled in a way, that the semantics can really be
> > supported by the dri
On Saturday 22 September 2007 11:48:00 Ulrich Kunitz wrote:
> A real high-quality driver will require Johannes' proposed
> mac80211 driver interface changes to be merged and TX
> confirmations handled in a way, that the semantics can really be
> supported by the driver. (Michael Buesh's patch is ta
Sorry for joining the discussion so late, but I have a day job
requires sometimes all of my time.
John W. Linville wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 11:08:16PM +0100, Daniel Drake wrote:
>
> > I would like to this until 2.6.25 until I have had time to clear up some
> > final issues and do more t
On Thu, 2007-09-20 at 11:37 -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
> You're on. BTW, I will let you be the primary tester of "[PATCH] fix softmac
> lockdep reports" that
> Johannes posted earlier today. I see you were CC'd. I plan on testing it with
> bcm43xx, but I won't
> get to it for a couple of days.
Daniel Drake wrote:
> John W. Linville wrote:
>> If you are determined not to have it in 2.6.24 then I will relent.
>> I will also suggest that Larry start sending any softmac bugs to
>> you... :-)
>
> That's fine.
You're on. BTW, I will let you be the primary tester of "[PATCH] fix softmac
loc
John W. Linville wrote:
I know that you will argue that a rename is unnecessary if we
simply port the existing driver to mac80211, which is certainly true.
I just wonder if that is the least bumpy solution for users. At least
with a new driver, if something doesn't work then the old driver is
st
On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 11:08:16PM +0100, Daniel Drake wrote:
> I would like to this until 2.6.25 until I have had time to clear up some
> final issues and do more testing myself of zd1211rw-mac80211. I also
> think we need to discuss the rename...
Renames being what they are, I was hoping to a
On Wed, Sep 19, 2007 at 11:12:50PM +0100, Daniel Drake wrote:
> John W. Linville wrote:
> BTW: I fairly regularly get email from F7 users complaining about
> connection intermittancy and other bugs that we don't seem to have for
> the softmac driver (maybe stack related issues, of which I've fix
John W. Linville wrote:
The maintainers have identified some (IMHO minor) issues with the
mac80211 port of this driver. Some of them are summarized here:
http://linuxwireless.org/en/users/Drivers/zd1211rw/mac80211Issues
Still, I think we would be better-off having this driver upstream.
John W. Linville wrote:
Jeff & Dave,
This patch adds z1211 (previously known as zd1211rw-mac80211),
a driver for Zydas ZD1211 hardware. This driver has proven very
robust -- Fedora 7 uses this driver and I don't think I have any open
bugzillas for it.
BTW: I fairly regularly get email from
From: Daniel Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 23:27:09 +0100
> zd1211rw-mac80211 does not currently add anything to the user experience
> over the existing driver, other than automatic rate adaption which is
> nice but hasn't proven itself to be of much importance given that the
David Miller wrote:
From: Daniel Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 23:08:16 +0100
John, thanks a lot for your efforts, I hope you don't mind waiting one
extra release cycle for me to sort a few things out.
Having "a driver" is always better for users than having "no driver".
Pl
From: Daniel Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 23:08:16 +0100
> John, thanks a lot for your efforts, I hope you don't mind waiting one
> extra release cycle for me to sort a few things out.
Having "a driver" is always better for users than having "no driver".
Please I ask you not
From: David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 12:56:41 -0700 (PDT)
> I agreed with John to merge this in myself, but this patch
> applied to the old driver aparently, not the new z1211 one.
>
> Can you resend this patch against the new driver so I can
> add it to net-2.6.24?
Neve
From: Michael Buesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 21:23:16 +0200
> John, please also note that the following patch is not merged, yet.
> http://bu3sch.de/patches/wireless-dev/20070915-1740/patches/006-zd-fix-tx-status.patch
> Without it ratecontrol does not work. It does neither scal
On Wednesday 19 September 2007 20:59:03 David Miller wrote:
> From: "John W. Linville" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 14:10:05 -0400
>
> > This patch adds z1211 (previously known as zd1211rw-mac80211),
> > a driver for Zydas ZD1211 hardware. This driver has proven very
> > robust --
From: "John W. Linville" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 14:10:05 -0400
> This patch adds z1211 (previously known as zd1211rw-mac80211),
> a driver for Zydas ZD1211 hardware. This driver has proven very
> robust -- Fedora 7 uses this driver and I don't think I have any open
> bugzillas
Jeff & Dave,
This patch adds z1211 (previously known as zd1211rw-mac80211),
a driver for Zydas ZD1211 hardware. This driver has proven very
robust -- Fedora 7 uses this driver and I don't think I have any open
bugzillas for it. Either the driver works well, or no one as using
it...given the comm
19 matches
Mail list logo
