On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 7:48 AM Jesper Dangaard Brouer
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 15 Apr 2019 10:58:07 -0700
> "Jonathan Lemon" wrote:
>
> > On 15 Apr 2019, at 9:32, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, 15 Apr 2019 13:59:03 +0200 Björn Töpel
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Hi,
> > >>
> > >> As you
On Mon, 15 Apr 2019 at 18:33, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
>
[...]
> >
> > Ok, please convince me! :-D
>
> I tried to above...
>
I think you (and Jakub) did. :-) Looks like a "queue" is a good
(necessary) abstraction, but I need to think more about how to e.g.
access "dedicated/isolated" AF_XDP
On Tue, 16 Apr 2019 15:55:23 +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Apr 2019 15:49:32 -0700
> Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 15 Apr 2019 18:32:58 +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> > > On Mon, 15 Apr 2019 13:59:03 +0200 Björn Töpel
> > > wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> >
On Tue, 16 Apr 2019 09:45:24 +0200, Björn Töpel wrote:
> > > > If we'd like to slice a netdevice into multiple queues. Isn't macvlan
> > > > or similar *virtual* netdevices a better path, instead of introducing
> > > > yet another abstraction?
> >
> > Yes, the question of use cases is extremely i
On Tue, 16 Apr 2019 at 18:53, Jonathan Lemon wrote:
>
> On 16 Apr 2019, at 6:55, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 15 Apr 2019 15:49:32 -0700
> > Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, 15 Apr 2019 18:32:58 +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 15 Apr 2019 13:59:03 +0200 Bjö
On 16 Apr 2019, at 6:55, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
On Mon, 15 Apr 2019 15:49:32 -0700
Jakub Kicinski wrote:
On Mon, 15 Apr 2019 18:32:58 +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
On Mon, 15 Apr 2019 13:59:03 +0200 Björn Töpel
wrote:
Hi,
As you probably can derive from the amount of time th
On Mon, 15 Apr 2019 10:58:07 -0700
"Jonathan Lemon" wrote:
> On 15 Apr 2019, at 9:32, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 15 Apr 2019 13:59:03 +0200 Björn Töpel
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> As you probably can derive from the amount of time this is taking,
> >> I'm
> >> not rea
On Mon, 15 Apr 2019 15:49:32 -0700
Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Apr 2019 18:32:58 +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> > On Mon, 15 Apr 2019 13:59:03 +0200 Björn Töpel
> > wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > As you probably can derive from the amount of time this is taking, I'm
> > > not re
Björn Töpel writes:
> On 2019-04-16 11:36, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>> Björn Töpel writes:
>>
>>> On Mon, 15 Apr 2019 at 18:33, Jesper Dangaard Brouer
>>> wrote:
On Mon, 15 Apr 2019 13:59:03 +0200 Björn Töpel
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As you probably can der
On 2019-04-16 11:36, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
Björn Töpel writes:
On Mon, 15 Apr 2019 at 18:33, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
On Mon, 15 Apr 2019 13:59:03 +0200 Björn Töpel wrote:
Hi,
As you probably can derive from the amount of time this is taking, I'm
not really satisfied with
On 2019/4/16 上午12:32, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
XDP is something that we can attach to a netdevice. Again, very
natural from a user perspective. As for XDP sockets, the current
mechanism is that we attach to an existing netdevice queue. Ideally
what we'd like is to*remove* the queue concep
On 2019/4/16 上午12:32, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
If we'd like to slice a netdevice into multiple queues. Isn't macvlan
or similar*virtual* netdevices a better path, instead of introducing
yet another abstraction?
XDP redirect a more generic abstraction that allow us to implement
macvlan.
Björn Töpel writes:
> On Mon, 15 Apr 2019 at 18:33, Jesper Dangaard Brouer
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Mon, 15 Apr 2019 13:59:03 +0200 Björn Töpel wrote:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > As you probably can derive from the amount of time this is taking, I'm
>> > not really satisfied with the design of per-queue
On Tue, 16 Apr 2019 at 00:49, Jakub Kicinski
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 15 Apr 2019 18:32:58 +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> > On Mon, 15 Apr 2019 13:59:03 +0200 Björn Töpel
> > wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > As you probably can derive from the amount of time this is taking, I'm
> > > not really sa
On Mon, 15 Apr 2019 at 18:33, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 15 Apr 2019 13:59:03 +0200 Björn Töpel wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > As you probably can derive from the amount of time this is taking, I'm
> > not really satisfied with the design of per-queue XDP program. (That,
> > plus I'm a
On Mon, 15 Apr 2019 18:32:58 +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Apr 2019 13:59:03 +0200 Björn Töpel wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > As you probably can derive from the amount of time this is taking, I'm
> > not really satisfied with the design of per-queue XDP program. (That,
> > plus I'm a
On 15 Apr 2019, at 9:32, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote:
On Mon, 15 Apr 2019 13:59:03 +0200 Björn Töpel
wrote:
Hi,
As you probably can derive from the amount of time this is taking,
I'm
not really satisfied with the design of per-queue XDP program. (That,
plus I'm a terribly slow hacker..
Jesper Dangaard Brouer writes:
> On Mon, 15 Apr 2019 13:59:03 +0200 Björn Töpel wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> As you probably can derive from the amount of time this is taking, I'm
>> not really satisfied with the design of per-queue XDP program. (That,
>> plus I'm a terribly slow hacker... ;-)) I'll t
On Mon, 15 Apr 2019 13:59:03 +0200 Björn Töpel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As you probably can derive from the amount of time this is taking, I'm
> not really satisfied with the design of per-queue XDP program. (That,
> plus I'm a terribly slow hacker... ;-)) I'll try to expand my thinking
> in this mail
19 matches
Mail list logo
