Olivier Crameri wrote:
Same thing but with the patch this time.
Since the VLAN device's features may also change in the handler,
shouldn't we check and generate a feature-change
event for the VLAN device(s) as well?
Ben
--
Ben Greear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.
On Fri, 29 Sep 2006 17:25:35 -0700
"Olivier Crameri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Same thing but with the patch this time.
>
> Sorry about that,
> Olivier Crameri
>
> On 9/29/06, Olivier Crameri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > after running some experiments, we realised that using VLA
Hi,
after running some experiments, we realised that using VLAN support in
Linux caused some overhead. It turned out to be that the offloading
features of our NIC (tso, sg, checksum offloading) were not beeing
used.
After digging a little bit in the code, we realised that the VLAN code
did not s
Same thing but with the patch this time.
Sorry about that,
Olivier Crameri
On 9/29/06, Olivier Crameri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
after running some experiments, we realised that using VLAN support in
Linux caused some overhead. It turned out to be that the offloading
features of our NIC (
