mon ; netdev@vger.kernel.org; Daniel Borkmann
> > ; Eran Ben Elisha ; Tariq Toukan
> > ; Saeed Mahameed
> > Subject: Re: New xdpsock sample
> >
> > On Thu, 28 Mar 2019 at 10:48, Maxim Mikityanskiy
> > wrote:
> > >
> > [...]
> > > > >
ahameed
> Subject: Re: New xdpsock sample
>
> On Thu, 28 Mar 2019 at 10:48, Maxim Mikityanskiy
> wrote:
> >
> [...]
> > > > Thanks for the good input, Max! The rationale for making the sample
> > > > simpler, was that most people was just C&Ping f
> On Mar 28, 2019, at 5:35 AM, Björn Töpel wrote:
>
> Magnus and I took the route to simplify the sample, to make it easier
> for new users. I still think that was the right path. Should there be
> a sample showcasing all the knobs/pulleys?
One problem I ran into yesterday is that the bpf prog
On Thu, 28 Mar 2019 at 10:48, Maxim Mikityanskiy wrote:
>
[...]
> > > Thanks for the good input, Max! The rationale for making the sample
> > > simpler, was that most people was just C&Ping from it and used it in
> > > their own code, so we aimed for a simple "fits-most-people" sample.
>
> I don't
on
> > > > Sent: 26 March, 2019 18:24
> > > > To: Jonathan Lemon
> > > > Cc: Maxim Mikityanskiy ; Magnus Karlsson
> > > > ; netdev@vger.kernel.org; Björn Töpel
> > > > ; Daniel Borkmann ; Eran
> Ben
> > > > Elisha ; Tariq Toukan ;
&
> > > Cc: Maxim Mikityanskiy ; Magnus Karlsson
> > > ; netdev@vger.kernel.org; Björn Töpel
> > > ; Daniel Borkmann ; Eran Ben
> > > Elisha ; Tariq Toukan ; Saeed
> > > Mahameed
> > > Subject: Re: New xdpsock sample
> > >
> > > On Tue,
Töpel
> > ; Daniel Borkmann ; Eran Ben
> > Elisha ; Tariq Toukan ; Saeed
> > Mahameed
> > Subject: Re: New xdpsock sample
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 5:13 PM Jonathan Lemon wrote:
> > >
> > > The rationale (IIRC) was that it would be easier for
> -Original Message-
> From: Magnus Karlsson
> Sent: 26 March, 2019 18:24
> To: Jonathan Lemon
> Cc: Maxim Mikityanskiy ; Magnus Karlsson
> ; netdev@vger.kernel.org; Björn Töpel
> ; Daniel Borkmann ; Eran Ben
> Elisha ; Tariq Toukan ; Saeed
> Mahameed
> S
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 5:13 PM Jonathan Lemon wrote:
>
> The rationale (IIRC) was that it would be easier for new users to
> get started using AF_XDP by providing everything that was needed
> by default.
>
> Passing in XSK_LIBBPF_FLAGS__INHIBIT_PROG to the library will
> bypass loading the sample
The rationale (IIRC) was that it would be easier for new users to
get started using AF_XDP by providing everything that was needed
by default.
Passing in XSK_LIBBPF_FLAGS__INHIBIT_PROG to the library will
bypass loading the sample program, so a user application may still
use the library with their
Hi Magnus and all,
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/cover/1045921/
This series removes xdpsock_kern.c and replaces it by the bytecode
hardcoded in libbpf. I am wondering whether there is some real issue
with having the XDP program in a separate C file, just like before,
because this change made it fa
11 matches
Mail list logo
