On 6/8/06, Grant Grundler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 11:41:28AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Now that we have a new tulip maintainer, perhaps a resend of the
> long-outstanding tulip phy patches could be resent?
All the tulip patches I have are archived here:
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 11:41:28AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Now that we have a new tulip maintainer, perhaps a resend of the
> long-outstanding tulip phy patches could be resent?
All the tulip patches I have are archived here:
ftp://ftp.parisc-linux.org/patches/
Anything else
Now that we have a new tulip maintainer, perhaps a resend of the
long-outstanding tulip phy patches could be resent?
With an active tulip maintainer, the "too-long mdelay" would hopefully
only exist temporarily -- with the proper fix being to move that code
into a kernel thread