Re: New tulip maintainer...

2006-06-08 Thread Valerie Henson
On 6/8/06, Grant Grundler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 11:41:28AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Now that we have a new tulip maintainer, perhaps a resend of the > long-outstanding tulip phy patches could be resent? All the tulip patches I have are archived here:

Re: New tulip maintainer...

2006-06-08 Thread Grant Grundler
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 11:41:28AM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Now that we have a new tulip maintainer, perhaps a resend of the > long-outstanding tulip phy patches could be resent? All the tulip patches I have are archived here: ftp://ftp.parisc-linux.org/patches/ Anything else

New tulip maintainer...

2006-06-08 Thread Jeff Garzik
Now that we have a new tulip maintainer, perhaps a resend of the long-outstanding tulip phy patches could be resent? With an active tulip maintainer, the "too-long mdelay" would hopefully only exist temporarily -- with the proper fix being to move that code into a kernel thread