I thought that support statement sounded familiar, large portions of
the source code and documentation are modified from an older release
of e1000. Nothing wrong with that as it's released under the GPL,
except that the copyright statements have mostly just been switched
from Intel to Attansic.
On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 13:44:43 -0500
John Haller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On Tue, 15 Aug 2006 18:23:19 -0500
> > Jay Cliburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> >>> On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 19:11:42 -0500
> >>> Jay Cliburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w
Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Tue, 15 Aug 2006 18:23:19 -0500
Jay Cliburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 19:11:42 -0500
Jay Cliburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...snip...
I've read the LKML FAQ regarding new driver submissions, but it implies
that the su
On Tue, 15 Aug 2006 18:23:19 -0500
Jay Cliburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 19:11:42 -0500
> > Jay Cliburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...snip...
> >> I've read the LKML FAQ regarding new driver submissions, but it implies
> >> that the submitter b
Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 19:11:42 -0500
Jay Cliburn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...snip...
I've read the LKML FAQ regarding new driver submissions, but it implies
that the submitter be willing to maintain the driver, which I'm not
qualified to do. I haven't contacted Attansi
I recently purchased an Asus M2V socket AM2 motherboard that comes with
an onboard Attansic L1 Gigabit Ethernet Controller. The CD that came
with the motherboard contains GPL'd driver source for the NIC. The
driver builds, installs, and functions cleanly in Fedora Core 5. Despite
the clear asser
