On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 01:00:24AM +0200, Hans Henrik Happe ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> On Thursday 08 June 2006 19:15, you wrote:
> > After some enhancements made for netchannel subsystem I'm pleased to
> > announce, that netchannel subsystem outperforms existing layered design
> > both in CPU u
On Thursday 08 June 2006 19:15, you wrote:
> After some enhancements made for netchannel subsystem I'm pleased to
> announce, that netchannel subsystem outperforms existing layered design
> both in CPU usage and network speed.
>
> Well, after such pretentious introduction I want to cool things dow
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 09:15:55PM +0400, Evgeniy Polyakov ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> After some enhancements made for netchannel subsystem I'm pleased to
> announce, that netchannel subsystem outperforms existing layered design
> both in CPU usage and network speed.
>
> Well, after such preten
After some enhancements made for netchannel subsystem I'm pleased to
announce, that netchannel subsystem outperforms existing layered design
both in CPU usage and network speed.
Well, after such pretentious introduction I want to cool things down.
CPU usage is about 1-2% less for netchannels and n
