On Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 12:51:14PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Dec 2006, Linas Vepstas wrote:
>
> >On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 07:38:12AM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> >>
> >>What about Linas patches to do interrupt mitigation with NAPI polling ?
> >>That didn't end up workin
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006, Linas Vepstas wrote:
On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 07:38:12AM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
What about Linas patches to do interrupt mitigation with NAPI polling ?
That didn't end up working ?
It seems to be "working as designed", which is different than "working
as nai
On Wed, Nov 08, 2006 at 07:38:12AM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
>
> What about Linas patches to do interrupt mitigation with NAPI polling ?
> That didn't end up working ?
It seems to be "working as designed", which is different than "working
as naively expected".
For large packets:
-- a
