Re: Merging SSB upstream

2007-05-07 Thread Michael Buesch
On Monday 07 May 2007 18:43:18 Gary Zambrano wrote: > On Sat, 2007-05-05 at 23:11 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > Michael Buesch wrote: > > > So, now that mac80211 is merged upstream, I think it's > > > time to merge SSB and the b44-ssb port upstream. > > > Note that bcm43xx-mac80211 is _not_ ready f

Re: Merging SSB upstream

2007-05-07 Thread Gary Zambrano
On Sat, 2007-05-05 at 23:11 -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote: > Michael Buesch wrote: > > So, now that mac80211 is merged upstream, I think it's > > time to merge SSB and the b44-ssb port upstream. > > Note that bcm43xx-mac80211 is _not_ ready for upstream, yet. > > > > What do you think? I'd like to merg

Re: Merging SSB upstream

2007-05-06 Thread Michael Buesch
On Sunday 06 May 2007 19:38:33 John W. Linville wrote: > On Sun, May 06, 2007 at 11:44:27AM +0200, Michael Buesch wrote: > > On Sunday 06 May 2007 04:00:51 John W. Linville wrote: > > > > I had to remove > > > the b44 ssb changes from fedora because a) users reported problems; > > > > Which prob

Re: Merging SSB upstream

2007-05-06 Thread John W. Linville
On Sun, May 06, 2007 at 11:44:27AM +0200, Michael Buesch wrote: > On Sunday 06 May 2007 04:00:51 John W. Linville wrote: > > I had to remove > > the b44 ssb changes from fedora because a) users reported problems; > > Which problems were that? The 2 compile issues? > Trivial to fix if that's the

Re: Merging SSB upstream

2007-05-06 Thread Michael Buesch
On Sunday 06 May 2007 04:00:51 John W. Linville wrote: > On Sun, May 06, 2007 at 03:03:17AM +0200, Michael Buesch wrote: > > So, now that mac80211 is merged upstream, I think it's > > time to merge SSB and the b44-ssb port upstream. > > Note that bcm43xx-mac80211 is _not_ ready for upstream, yet. >

Re: Merging SSB upstream

2007-05-06 Thread Michael Buesch
On Sunday 06 May 2007 05:11:44 Jeff Garzik wrote: > Michael Buesch wrote: > > So, now that mac80211 is merged upstream, I think it's > > time to merge SSB and the b44-ssb port upstream. > > Note that bcm43xx-mac80211 is _not_ ready for upstream, yet. > > > > What do you think? I'd like to merge ss

Re: Merging SSB upstream

2007-05-05 Thread Jeff Garzik
Michael Buesch wrote: So, now that mac80211 is merged upstream, I think it's time to merge SSB and the b44-ssb port upstream. Note that bcm43xx-mac80211 is _not_ ready for upstream, yet. What do you think? I'd like to merge ssb as-is, although the embedded-device parts are not quite finished, ye

Re: Merging SSB upstream

2007-05-05 Thread John W. Linville
On Sun, May 06, 2007 at 03:03:17AM +0200, Michael Buesch wrote: > So, now that mac80211 is merged upstream, I think it's > time to merge SSB and the b44-ssb port upstream. > Note that bcm43xx-mac80211 is _not_ ready for upstream, yet. ACK, unfortunately. > What do you think? I'd like to merge ss

Merging SSB upstream

2007-05-05 Thread Michael Buesch
So, now that mac80211 is merged upstream, I think it's time to merge SSB and the b44-ssb port upstream. Note that bcm43xx-mac80211 is _not_ ready for upstream, yet. What do you think? I'd like to merge ssb as-is, although the embedded-device parts are not quite finished, yet. But they don't interf