Re: Machine check in bcm43xx_phy_initg

2006-05-05 Thread David Woodhouse
On Fri, 2006-05-05 at 19:42 +0200, Michael Buesch wrote: > > Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Signed-off-by: Michael Buesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > John, please apply. I will also send a patch for d80211. Would be good to get this into 2.6.17 too. -- dwmw2 - To unsubscribe

Re: Machine check in bcm43xx_phy_initg

2006-05-05 Thread Michael Buesch
On Friday 05 May 2006 20:18, you wrote: > On Fri, 2006-05-05 at 19:42 +0200, Michael Buesch wrote: > > > Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Signed-off-by: Michael Buesch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > John, please apply. I will also send a patch for d80211. > > Would be good to g

Re: Machine check in bcm43xx_phy_initg

2006-05-05 Thread Michael Buesch
On Friday 05 May 2006 19:19, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Fri, 2006-05-05 at 12:59 -0400, Joseph Jezak wrote: > > I fixed the specs, it should be bcm->chip_package == 2, sorry for the > > mistake. > > Thanks. The correct patch should look like this then... > > [BCM43xx] Fix access to non-existent