Hello,
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 03:31:02PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > We also have about a bazillion
> >
> > warning: ‘*’ in boolean context, suggest ‘&&’ instead
> >
> > warnings in drivers/ata/libata-core.c, all due to a single macro that
> > uses a pattern that gcc-7.1.1 doesn't like. T
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 3:10 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 03:35:15PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>> [ Very random list of maintainers and mailing lists, at least
>> partially by number of warnings generated by gcc-7.1.1 that is then
>> correlated with the get_maintainer
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 5:41 AM, Linus Torvalds
wrote:
>
> We also have about a bazillion
>
> warning: ‘*’ in boolean context, suggest ‘&&’ instead
>
> warnings in drivers/ata/libata-core.c, all due to a single macro that
> uses a pattern that gcc-7.1.1 doesn't like. The warning looks a bit
>
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 03:35:15PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> [ Very random list of maintainers and mailing lists, at least
> partially by number of warnings generated by gcc-7.1.1 that is then
> correlated with the get_maintainers script ]
>
> So I upgraded one of my boxes to F26, which upgra
Em Tue, 11 Jul 2017 15:35:15 -0700
Linus Torvalds escreveu:
> [ Very random list of maintainers and mailing lists, at least
> partially by number of warnings generated by gcc-7.1.1 that is then
> correlated with the get_maintainers script ]
Under drivers/media, I fixed a bunch of gcc 7.1 warning
On Tue, 11 Jul 2017 15:35:15 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> I do suspect I'll make "-Wformat-truncation" (as opposed to
> "-Wformat-overflow") be a "V=1" kind of warning. But let's see how
> many of these we can fix, ok?
Somehow related - what's the stand on -Wimplicit-fallthrough? I run
into th
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 8:17 PM, Linus Torvalds
wrote:
>
> If that's the case, I'd prefer just turning off the format-truncation
> (but not overflow) warning with '-Wno-format-trunction".
Doing
KBUILD_CFLAGS += $(call cc-disable-warning, format-truncation)
in the main Makefile certainly cuts
On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 8:10 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>
> The hwmon warnings are all about supporting no more than 9,999 sensors
> (applesmc) to 999,999,999 sensors (scpi) of a given type.
Yeah, I think that's enough.
> Easy "fix" would be to replace snprintf() with scnprintf(), presumably
> bec
On 07/11/2017 03:35 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
[ Very random list of maintainers and mailing lists, at least
partially by number of warnings generated by gcc-7.1.1 that is then
correlated with the get_maintainers script ]
So I upgraded one of my boxes to F26, which upgraded the compiler to gcc-7.
Hi Linus,
> At the same time, others aren't quite as insane, and in many cases the
> warnings might be easy to just fix.
>
> And some actually look valid, although they might still require odd input:
>
> net/bluetooth/smp.c: In function ‘le_max_key_size_read’:
> net/bluetooth/smp.c:3372:29: wa
[ Very random list of maintainers and mailing lists, at least
partially by number of warnings generated by gcc-7.1.1 that is then
correlated with the get_maintainers script ]
So I upgraded one of my boxes to F26, which upgraded the compiler to gcc-7.1.1
Which in turn means that my nice clean allm
11 matches
Mail list logo