On 08/17/2015 12:18 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
From: Eric Dumazet
Then can you try following fix as well ?
Thanks !
[PATCH] timer: fix a race in __mod_timer()
I have been running the latest code from git with the 2 patches in this
thread applied. No issues so far.
-Jon
--
To unsubs
On Mon, 17 Aug 2015, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> [PATCH] timer: fix a race in __mod_timer()
>
> lock_timer_base() can not catch following :
>
> CPU1 ( in __mod_timer()
> timer->flags |= TIMER_MIGRATING;
> spin_unlock(&base->lock);
> base = new_base;
> spin_lock(&base->lock);
> timer->flags &= ~TIMER_BA
On 2015-08-17 19:18, Eric Dumazet wrote:
From: Eric Dumazet
On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 16:25 +0200, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
Monday, August 17, 2015, 4:21:47 PM, you wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 09:02 -0500, Jon Christopherson wrote:
>> This is very similar to the behavior I am seeing in this b
From: Eric Dumazet
On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 16:25 +0200, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
> Monday, August 17, 2015, 4:21:47 PM, you wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 09:02 -0500, Jon Christopherson wrote:
> >> This is very similar to the behavior I am seeing in this bug:
> >>
> >> https://bugzilla.kern
On 08/17/2015 09:25 AM, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
> OK, but have you applied the fix ?
>
http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/davem/net.git/commit/?id=83fccfc3940c4a2db90fd7e7079f5b465cd8c6af
> It will be part of net iteration from David Miller to Linus Torvald.
I did not have that
Monday, August 17, 2015, 4:21:47 PM, you wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 09:02 -0500, Jon Christopherson wrote:
>> This is very similar to the behavior I am seeing in this bug:
>>
>> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102911
> OK, but have you applied the fix ?
> http://git.kernel.org/
On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 09:02 -0500, Jon Christopherson wrote:
> This is very similar to the behavior I am seeing in this bug:
>
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102911
OK, but have you applied the fix ?
http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/davem/net.git/commit/?id=83fccfc3940c
This is very similar to the behavior I am seeing in this bug:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102911
-Jon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordom
Monday, August 17, 2015, 3:37:13 PM, you wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 11:09 +0200, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>> Saturday, August 15, 2015, 12:39:25 AM, you wrote:
>>
>> > On Sat, 2015-08-15 at 00:09 +0200, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>> >> On 2015-08-13 00:41, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>> >> > On Wed,
On Mon, 2015-08-17 at 11:09 +0200, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
> Saturday, August 15, 2015, 12:39:25 AM, you wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 2015-08-15 at 00:09 +0200, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
> >> On 2015-08-13 00:41, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> >> > On Wed, 2015-08-12 at 23:46 +0200, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
> >
Saturday, August 15, 2015, 12:39:25 AM, you wrote:
> On Sat, 2015-08-15 at 00:09 +0200, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>> On 2015-08-13 00:41, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>> > On Wed, 2015-08-12 at 23:46 +0200, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
>> >
>> >> Thanks for the reminder, but luckily i was aware of that,
>>
On Sat, 2015-08-15 at 00:09 +0200, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
> On 2015-08-13 00:41, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > On Wed, 2015-08-12 at 23:46 +0200, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
> >
> >> Thanks for the reminder, but luckily i was aware of that,
> >> seen enough of your replies asking for patches to be resu
On 2015-08-15 00:09, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
On 2015-08-13 00:41, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Wed, 2015-08-12 at 23:46 +0200, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
Thanks for the reminder, but luckily i was aware of that,
seen enough of your replies asking for patches to be resubmitted
against "the other tre
On 2015-08-13 00:41, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Wed, 2015-08-12 at 23:46 +0200, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
Thanks for the reminder, but luckily i was aware of that,
seen enough of your replies asking for patches to be resubmitted
against "the other tree" ;)
Kernel with patch is currently running so
On Wed, 2015-08-12 at 23:46 +0200, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
> Thanks for the reminder, but luckily i was aware of that,
> seen enough of your replies asking for patches to be resubmitted
> against "the other tree" ;)
> Kernel with patch is currently running so fingers crossed.
Thanks for testing
On 2015-08-12 23:40, David Miller wrote:
From: li...@eikelenboom.it
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 22:50:42 +0200
On 2015-08-12 22:41, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Wed, 2015-08-12 at 21:19 +0200, li...@eikelenboom.it wrote:
Hi,
On my box running Xen with a 4.2-rc6 kernel i still get this splat
in
dom0,
w
From: li...@eikelenboom.it
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2015 22:50:42 +0200
> On 2015-08-12 22:41, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>> On Wed, 2015-08-12 at 21:19 +0200, li...@eikelenboom.it wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> On my box running Xen with a 4.2-rc6 kernel i still get this splat in
>>> dom0,
>>> which crashes the box.
>>> (
On 2015-08-12 22:41, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Wed, 2015-08-12 at 21:19 +0200, li...@eikelenboom.it wrote:
Hi,
On my box running Xen with a 4.2-rc6 kernel i still get this splat in
dom0,
which crashes the box.
(i reported a similar splat before (at rc4) here,
http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/ms
On Wed, 2015-08-12 at 21:19 +0200, li...@eikelenboom.it wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On my box running Xen with a 4.2-rc6 kernel i still get this splat in
> dom0,
> which crashes the box.
> (i reported a similar splat before (at rc4) here,
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg337570.html)
>
> Never see
Hi,
On my box running Xen with a 4.2-rc6 kernel i still get this splat in
dom0,
which crashes the box.
(i reported a similar splat before (at rc4) here,
http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg337570.html)
Never seen this one on 4.1, so it seems a regression.
--
Sander
[81133.193439] gener
20 matches
Mail list logo
